Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38467874›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2024

Update on imaging recommendations in paediatric uroradiology: the European Society of Paediatric Radiology workgroup session on voiding cystourethrography.

Maria Beatrice Damasio, Francesco Donati, Costanza Bruno, Kassa Darge, Hans-Joachim Mentzel, Damjana Ključevšek, Marcello Napolitano, H Nursun Ozcan, Michael Riccabona, Anne M Smets and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
23.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 14 institutions in 10 countries.

Maria Beatrice DamasioPediatric Radiology Department, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Via Gerolamo Gaslini 5, 16147, Genoa, Italy. beatricedamasio@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6737-1090
Francesco DonatiPediatric Surgery Department, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.
Costanza BrunoRadiology Department, AOUI Verona (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata), Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9738-1457
Kassa DargeDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8989-6485
Hans-Joachim MentzelSection of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0199-3257
Damjana KljučevšekDepartment of Radiology, University Children's Hospital Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0001-7075-2943
Marcello NapolitanoDepartment of Pediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology, V. Buzzi Children's Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0288-3858
H Nursun OzcanDepartment of Radiology/Division of Pediatric Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-4756-4359
Michael RiccabonaDepartment of Radiology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Anne M SmetsDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0684-1436
Carmelo SofiaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Morphologic and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0034-6880
Samuel StafraceMcMaster University and McMaster Children's Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0056-5311
Philippe PetitDepartment of Pediatric Radiology, Hopital Timone Enfants, Aix Marseille-Université, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8395-0882
Lil-Sofie Ording MüllerDivision of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Paediatric Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6529-4984
Aix-Marseille Université · FRAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona · ITChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USHacettepe University · TRIstituto Giannina Gaslini · ITJena University Hospital · DELjubljana University Medical Centre · SIMcMaster Children's Hospital · CAMedical University of Graz · ATOslo University Hospital · NOOspedale dei Bambini Vittore Buzzi · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) is a fluoroscopic technique that allows the assessment of the urinary tract, including the urethra, bladder, and-if vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is present-the ureters and the pelvicalyceal systems. The technique also allows for the assessment of bladder filling and emptying, providing information on anatomical and functional aspects. VCUG is, together with contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (VUS), still the gold standard test to diagnose VUR and it is one of the most performed fluoroscopic examinations in pediatric radiology departments. VCUG is also considered a follow-up examination after urinary tract surgery, and one of the most sensitive techniques for studying anatomy of the lower genitourinary tract in suspected anatomical malformations. The international reflux study in 1985 published the first reflux-protocol and graded VUR into five classes; over the following years, other papers have been published on this topic. In 2008, the European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR) Uroradiology Task Force published the first proposed VCUG Guidelines with internal scientific society agreement. The purpose of our work is to create a detailed overview of VCUG indications, procedural recommendations, and to provide a structured final report, with the aim of updating the 2008 VCUG paper proposed by the European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR). We have also compared VCUG with contrast-enhanced VUS as an emergent alternative. As a result of this work, the ESPR Urogenital Task Force strongly recommends the use of contrast-enhanced VUS as a non-radiating imaging technique whenever indicated and possible.

Indexed as

RadiologyVesico-Ureteral RefluxChildContrast MediaHumansInfantUltrasonographyUrethraUrinary BladderUrinationContrast MediaChildrenContrast-enhanced voiding urosonographyPelvicalyceal dilatationStructured reportUrinary tract infectionVesicoureteral refluxVoiding cystourethrography

Identifiers

PMID38467874
OpenAlexW4392638193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.