Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38467853›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024

MRI, clinical, and radiomic models for differentiation of uterine leiomyosarcoma and leiomyoma.

Lauren A Roller, Qi Wan, Xiaoyang Liu, Lei Qin, David Chapel, Kristine S Burk, Yang Guo, Atul B Shinagare

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Radiomics-based ultrasOund Model for differentiating Uterine Sarcomas from leiomyomas (ROMUS): a retrospective pilot Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer (MITO) study.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lauren A Roller *Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. lroller@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3135-2482
Qi Wan *Department of Imaging, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Xiaoyang LiuDepartment of Medical Imaging, University Medical Imaging Toronto, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5T1W7, Canada.
Lei QinDepartment of Imaging, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
David ChapelDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Kristine S BurkDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Yang GuoDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Atul B ShinagareDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the predictive ability of conventional MRI features and MRI texture features in differentiating uterine leiomyoma (LM) from uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS).

methodsThis single-center, IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study included 108 patients (69 LM, 39 LMS) who had pathology, preoperative MRI, and clinical data available at our tertiary academic institution. Two radiologists independently evaluated 14 features on preoperative MRI. Texture features based on 3D segmentation were extracted from T2W-weighted MRI (T2WI) using commercially available texture software (TexRAD™, Feedback Medical Ltd., Great Britain). MRI conventional features, and clinical and MRI texture features were compared between LM and LMS groups. Dataset was randomly divided into training (86 cases) and testing (22 cases) cohorts (8:2 ratio); training cohort was further subdivided into training and validation sets using ten-fold cross-validation. Optimal radiomics model was selected out of 90 different machine learning pipelines and five models containing different combinations of MRI, clinical, and radiomics variables.

results12/14 MRI conventional features and 2/2 clinical features were significantly different between LM and LMS groups. MRI conventional features had moderate to excellent inter-reader agreement for all but two features. Models combining MRI conventional and clinical features (AUC 0.956) and MRI conventional, clinical, and radiomics features (AUC 0.989) had better performance compared to models containing MRI conventional features alone (AUC 0.846 and 0.890) or radiomics features alone (0.929).

conclusionWhile multiple MRI and clinical features differed between LM and LMS groups, the model combining MRI, clinical, and radiomic features had the best predictive ability but was only marginally better than a model utilizing conventional MRI and clinical data alone.

Indexed as

LeiomyomaLeiomyosarcomaMagnetic Resonance ImagingUterine NeoplasmsAdultAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMiddle AgedRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesFibroidsLeiomyomaLeiomyosarcomaMRIRadiomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.