ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024
MRI, clinical, and radiomic models for differentiation of uterine leiomyosarcoma and leiomyoma.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiomics-based ultrasOund Model for differentiating Uterine Sarcomas from leiomyomas (ROMUS): a retrospective pilot Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer (MITO) study.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026Observational
- Liquid Biopsy in Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: Current Biomarkers, Emerging Technologies, and Future Perspectives.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Automated detection of primary soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities using artificial intelligence and ChatGPT.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Validation of biomarkers and clinical scores for the detection of uterine leiomyosarcoma: a case-control study with an update of pLMS.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- WOAENet: a whale optimization-guided ensemble deep learning with soft voting for uterine cancer diagnosis based on MRI images.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted radiation imaging pathways for distinguishing uterine fibroids and malignant lesions in patients presenting with cancer pain: a literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the predictive ability of conventional MRI features and MRI texture features in differentiating uterine leiomyoma (LM) from uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS).
methodsThis single-center, IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study included 108 patients (69 LM, 39 LMS) who had pathology, preoperative MRI, and clinical data available at our tertiary academic institution. Two radiologists independently evaluated 14 features on preoperative MRI. Texture features based on 3D segmentation were extracted from T2W-weighted MRI (T2WI) using commercially available texture software (TexRAD™, Feedback Medical Ltd., Great Britain). MRI conventional features, and clinical and MRI texture features were compared between LM and LMS groups. Dataset was randomly divided into training (86 cases) and testing (22 cases) cohorts (8:2 ratio); training cohort was further subdivided into training and validation sets using ten-fold cross-validation. Optimal radiomics model was selected out of 90 different machine learning pipelines and five models containing different combinations of MRI, clinical, and radiomics variables.
results12/14 MRI conventional features and 2/2 clinical features were significantly different between LM and LMS groups. MRI conventional features had moderate to excellent inter-reader agreement for all but two features. Models combining MRI conventional and clinical features (AUC 0.956) and MRI conventional, clinical, and radiomics features (AUC 0.989) had better performance compared to models containing MRI conventional features alone (AUC 0.846 and 0.890) or radiomics features alone (0.929).
conclusionWhile multiple MRI and clinical features differed between LM and LMS groups, the model combining MRI, clinical, and radiomic features had the best predictive ability but was only marginally better than a model utilizing conventional MRI and clinical data alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38467853What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.