Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38467808›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2024

Detection of COVID-19 features in lung ultrasound images using deep neural networks.

Lingyi Zhao, Tiffany Clair Fong, Muyinatu A Lediju Bell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lingyi ZhaoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8544-3326
Tiffany Clair FongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8843-5177
Muyinatu A Lediju BellDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. mledijubell@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8394-4482

Funding

A Machine Learning Alternative to Beamforming to Improve Ultrasound Image Quality for Interventional Access to the KidneyR21EB025621 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BELL, MUYINATU A. LEDIJU · 2018 to 2021
$859k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB025621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep neural networks (DNNs) to detect COVID-19 features in lung ultrasound B-mode images have primarily relied on either in vivo or simulated images as training data. However, in vivo images suffer from limited access to required manual labeling of thousands of training image examples, and simulated images can suffer from poor generalizability to in vivo images due to domain differences. We address these limitations and identify the best training strategy.

methodsWe investigated in vivo COVID-19 feature detection with DNNs trained on our carefully simulated datasets (40,000 images), publicly available in vivo datasets (174 images), in vivo datasets curated by our team (958 images), and a combination of simulated and internal or external in vivo datasets. Seven DNN training strategies were tested on in vivo B-mode images from COVID-19 patients.

resultsHere, we show that Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) between ground truth and DNN predictions are maximized when simulated data are mixed with external in vivo data and tested on internal in vivo data (i.e., 0.482 ± 0.211), compared with using only simulated B-mode image training data (i.e., 0.464 ± 0.230) or only external in vivo B-mode training data (i.e., 0.407 ± 0.177). Additional maximization is achieved when a separate subset of the internal in vivo B-mode images are included in the training dataset, with the greatest maximization of DSC (and minimization of required training time, or epochs) obtained after mixing simulated data with internal and external in vivo data during training, then testing on the held-out subset of the internal in vivo dataset (i.e., 0.735 ± 0.187).

conclusionsDNNs trained with simulated and in vivo data are promising alternatives to training with only real or only simulated data when segmenting in vivo COVID-19 lung ultrasound features.

Identifiers

PMID38467808
PMCPMC10928066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.