Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38467752›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Development and validation of prognostic machine learning models for short- and long-term mortality among acutely admitted patients based on blood tests.

Baker Nawfal Jawad, Shakir Maytham Shaker, Izzet Altintas, Jesper Eugen-Olsen, Jan O Nehlin, Ove Andersen, Thomas Kallemose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Baker Nawfal JawadDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark. Baker.jawad@regionh.dk.
Shakir Maytham ShakerDepartment of Data Science, IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Izzet AltintasDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Jesper Eugen-OlsenDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Jan O NehlinDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Ove AndersenDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Thomas KallemoseDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several scores predicting mortality at the emergency department have been developed. However, all with shortcomings either simple and applicable in a clinical setting, with poor performance, or advanced, with high performance, but clinically difficult to implement. This study aimed to explore if machine learning algorithms could predict all-cause short- and long-term mortality based on the routine blood test collected at admission.

methodsWe analyzed data from a retrospective cohort study, including patients > 18 years admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) of Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark between November 2013 and March 2017. The primary outcomes were 3-, 10-, 30-, and 365-day mortality after admission. PyCaret, an automated machine learning library, was used to evaluate the predictive performance of fifteen machine learning algorithms using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

resultsData from 48,841 admissions were analyzed, of these 34,190 (70%) were randomly divided into training data, and 14,651 (30%) were in test data. Eight machine learning algorithms achieved very good to excellent results of AUC on test data in a of range 0.85-0.93. In prediction of short-term mortality, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), leukocyte counts and differentials, Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) were the best predictors, whereas prediction of long-term mortality was favored by age, LDH, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), albumin, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN).

conclusionThe findings suggest that measures of biomarkers taken from one blood sample during admission to the ED can identify patients at high risk of short-and long-term mortality following emergency admissions.

Indexed as

Hematologic TestsHospitalizationHumansMachine LearningPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38467752
PMCPMC10928126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.