Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38467745›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2024

Neonatal respiratory care practice among level III and IV NICUs in New England.

Helen Healy, Bernadette Levesque, Kristen T Leeman, Ruben Vaidya, Emily Whitesel, Sherman Chu, Justin Goldstein, Shruti Gupta, Bharati Sinha, Munish Gupta and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Helen HealyBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. hhealy@bidmc.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0519-4759
Bernadette LevesqueBoston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Kristen T LeemanBoston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3410-9675
Ruben VaidyaBaystate Newborn Medicine, Springfield, MA, USA.
Emily WhiteselBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Sherman ChuUMass Memorial Medical Center, Worchester, MA, USA.
Justin GoldsteinBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Shruti GuptaYale New Haven Health-Greenwich Hospital, Greenwich, CT, USA.
Bharati SinhaBoston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Munish GuptaBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Megan AuroraMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-4808-412X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess respiratory care guidelines and explore variations in management of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants within a collaborative care framework. Additionally, to gather clinical leaders' perspectives on guidelines and preferences for ventilation modalities. STUDY

designLeaders from each NICU participated in a practice survey regarding the prevalence of unit clinical guidelines, and management, at many stages of care.

resultsUnits have an average of 4.3 (±2.1) guidelines, of 9 topics queried. Guideline prevalence was not associated with practice or outcomes. An FiO

conclusionsResults identify trends and areas of variation and suggest that the presence of guidelines alone is not predictive of outcome.

Indexed as

Infant, Very Low Birth WeightIntensive Care Units, NeonatalPractice Guidelines as TopicRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornContinuous Positive Airway PressureHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureNew EnglandPractice Patterns, Physicians'Pulmonary SurfactantsRespiration, ArtificialPulmonary Surfactants

Identifiers

PMID38467745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.