ArticleScientific reports2024
Anomaly detection in IoT-based healthcare: machine learning for enhanced security.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart IoT applications of multi attack detection using cluster F1MI approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An explainable multi-head attention network for healthcare IoT threat detection based on the MedDefender-MHAN framework.PloS one · 2026Article
- Explainable Deep Reinforcement Learning for Anomaly Detection in IoT-Enabled Metaverse Healthcare: Toward Trustworthy Cyber Threat Intelligence.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal transferability of multi-temporal random forest model for mappingFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Evaluating machine learning approaches for multiple attack classification with improved computational efficiency in IoT networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Robust IoT security using isolation forest and one class SVM algorithms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimizing IoT intrusion detection with cosine similarity based dataset balancing and hybrid deep learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Intelligent health model for medical imaging to guide laymen using neural cellular automata.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Secure and intelligent 5G-enabled remote patient monitoring using ANN and Choquet integral fuzzy VIKOR.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Securing the 6G-IoT Environment: A Framework for Enhancing Transparency in Artificial Intelligence Decision-Making Through Explainable Artificial Intelligence.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Intelligent Intrusion Detection System Against Various Attacks Based on a Hybrid Deep Learning Algorithm.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An intelligent hybrid approach combining fuzzy C-means and the sperm whale algorithm for cyber attack detection in IoT networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A novel deep synthesis-based insider intrusion detection (DS-IID) model for malicious insiders and AI-generated threats.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Internet of Things (IoT) integration in healthcare improves patient care while also making healthcare delivery systems more effective and economical. To fully realize the advantages of IoT in healthcare, it is imperative to overcome issues with data security, interoperability, and ethical considerations. IoT sensors periodically measure the health-related data of the patients and share it with a server for further evaluation. At the server, different machine learning algorithms are applied which help in early diagnosis of diseases and issue alerts in case vital signs are out of the normal range. Different cyber attacks can be launched on IoT devices which can result in compromised security and privacy of applications such as health care. In this paper, we utilize the publicly available Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity (CIC) IoT dataset to model machine learning techniques for efficient detection of anomalous network traffic. The dataset consists of 33 types of IoT attacks which are divided into 7 main categories. In the current study, the dataset is pre-processed, and a balanced representation of classes is used in generating a non-biased supervised (Random Forest, Adaptive Boosting, Logistic Regression, Perceptron, Deep Neural Network) machine learning models. These models are analyzed further by eliminating highly correlated features, reducing dimensionality, minimizing overfitting, and speeding up training times. Random Forest was found to perform optimally across binary and multiclass classification of IoT Attacks with an approximate accuracy of 99.55% under both reduced and all feature space. This improvement was complimented by a reduction in computational response time which is essential for real-time attack detection and response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.