Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38467674›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Assessing biologic/toxicologic effects of extractables from plastic contact materials for advanced therapy manufacturing using cell painting assay and cytotoxicity screening.

Ina Pahl, Axel Pahl, Armin Hauk, Dana Budde, Sonja Sievers, Lothar Fruth, Roberto Menzel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ina PahlSartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, August-Spindler-Str. 11, 37079, Göttingen, Germany. ina.pahl@sartorius.com.
Axel PahlCompound Management and Screening Center, MPI of Molecular Physiology, Otto-Hahn-Str. 11, 44227, Dortmund, Germany.
Armin HaukSartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, August-Spindler-Str. 11, 37079, Göttingen, Germany.
Dana BuddeSartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, August-Spindler-Str. 11, 37079, Göttingen, Germany.
Sonja SieversCompound Management and Screening Center, MPI of Molecular Physiology, Otto-Hahn-Str. 11, 44227, Dortmund, Germany.
Lothar FruthTox Expert GmbH, An der Feldscheide 1, 37083, Göttingen, Germany.
Roberto MenzelSartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, August-Spindler-Str. 11, 37079, Göttingen, Germany.
Sartorius (Germany) · DEMax Planck Institute of Molecular Physiology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plastic components are essential in the pharmaceutical industry, encompassing container closure systems, laboratory handling equipment, and single-use systems. As part of their material qualification process, studies on interactions between plastic contact materials and process solutions or drug products are conducted. The assessment of single-use systems includes their potential impact on patient safety, product quality, and process performance. This is particularly crucial in cell and gene therapy applications since interactions with the plastic contact material may result in an adverse effect on the isolated therapeutic human cells. We utilized the cell painting assay (CPA), a non-targeted method, for profiling the morphological characteristics of U2OS human osteosarcoma cells in contact with chemicals related to plastic contact materials. Specifically, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of 45 common plastic extractables, and two extracts from single-use systems. Results of the CPA are compared with a standard cytotoxicity assay, an osteogenesis differentiation assay, and in silico toxicity predictions. The findings of this feasibility study demonstrate that the device extracts and most of the tested compounds do not evoke any measurable biological changes on the cells (induction  ≤ 5%) among the 579 cell features measured at concentrations  ≤ 50 µM. CPA can serve as an important assay to reveal unique information not accessible through quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis and vice versa. The results highlight the need for a combination of in vitro and in silico methods in a comprehensive assessment of single-use equipment utilized in advanced therapy medicinal products manufacturing.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsDrug PackagingDrug ContaminationDrug IndustryHumansPatient SafetyPharmaceutical PreparationsResearch DesignBiological ProductsPharmaceutical PreparationsAdvanced therapy medicinal products (ATMP)Cell and gene therapyCell painting assay (CPA)Extractables and leachablesProcess equipment-related leachables (PERL)Single-use systems

Identifiers

PMID38467674
PMCPMC10928227
OpenAlexW4392642008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.