Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38467273›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2024

A pragmatic randomized clinical trial of multilevel interventions to improve adherence to lung cancer screening (The Larch Study): Study protocol.

Casey Luce, Lorella Palazzo, Melissa L Anderson, Lisa Carter-Bawa, Hongyuan Gao, Beverly B Green, James D Ralston, Kristine Rogers, Yu-Ru Su, Leah Tuzzio and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05747443 (Multilevel Interventions to Increase Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05747443 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Multilevel Interventions to Increase Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaiser PermanenteRan2022 to 2026Enrolled1,837ConditionsLung Cancer, Lung Cancer ScreeningArmsStepped Reminders, Patient Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Frontiers in health services · 2026
    Article
  5. Journal of health communication · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Casey LuceKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: casey.luce@kp.org.
Lorella PalazzoKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Melissa L AndersonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lisa Carter-BawaCenter for Discovery and Innovation at Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, NJ, USA.
Hongyuan GaoKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Beverly B GreenKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA; Kaiser Permanente Bernard J Tyson School of Medicine, Department of Health Systems Science, Pasadena, CA, USA.
James D RalstonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kristine RogersKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Yu-Ru SuKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Leah TuzzioKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Matthew TripletteFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Karen J WernliKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA; Kaiser Permanente Bernard J Tyson School of Medicine, Department of Health Systems Science, Pasadena, CA, USA.

Funding

Patient Provider Communication Larch SupplementR01CA262015 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI WERNLI, KAREN J · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA262015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn real-world settings, low adherence to lung cancer screening (LCS) diminishes population-level benefits of reducing lung cancer mortality. We describe the Larch Study protocol, which tests the effectiveness of two patient-centered interventions (Patient Voices Video and Stepped Reminders) designed to address barriers and improve annual LCS adherence.

methodsThe Larch Study is a pragmatic randomized clinical trial conducted within Kaiser Permanente Washington. Eligible patients (target n = 1606) are aged 50-78 years with an index low-dose CT (LDCT) of the chest with negative or benign findings. With a 2 × 2 factorial-design, patients are individually randomized to 1 of 4 arms: video only, reminders only, both video and reminders, or usual care. The Patient Voices video addresses patient education needs by normalizing LCS, reminding patients when LCS is due, and encouraging social support. Stepped Reminders prompts primary care physicians to order patient's repeat screening LDCT and patients to schedule their scan. Intervention delivery is embedded within routine healthcare, facilitated by shared electronic health record components. Primary outcome is adherence to national LCS clinical guidelines, defined as repeat LDCT within 9-15 months. Patient-reported outcomes are measured via survey (knowledge of LCS, perception of stigma) approximately 8 weeks after index LDCT. Our mixed-methods formative evaluation includes process data, collected during the trial, and interviews with trial participants and stakeholders. DISCUSSION: Results will fill an important scientific gap on multilevel interventions to increase annual LCS adherence and provide opportunities for spread and scale to other healthcare settings. REGISTRATION: Trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT05747443).

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsPatient CompliancePatient Education as TopicReminder SystemsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSocial SupportTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID38467273
PMCPMC11065591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.