Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38467039›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024

MR-linac MLC positioning QA by digitally stitching dual double-exposed films.

Sheng-Hsuan Sun, Erika Kollitz, Wen-Chih Tseng, Amanda Schwarz, Luke Maloney, Jonathan Li, Chihray Liu, Guanghua Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sheng-Hsuan SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Erika KollitzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Wen-Chih TsengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Amanda SchwarzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Luke MaloneyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Jonathan LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Chihray LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Guanghua YanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe picket fence (PF) test is highly recommended for multi-leaf collimator (MLC) quality assurance. However, since the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) on the Elekta Unity only covers a small area, it is not feasible to perform the PF test for the entire MLC. Here, we propose a technique for the PF test by stitching two double-exposed films.

methodsTwo EBT3 films were used to encompass the entire MLC, with each one covering one half of the area. Two fields were employed to apply double exposure: a PF pattern consisting of 11 2 mm wide pickets and a 2.84 cm x 22 cm open field. The edges of the open field defined by the diaphragms were used to correct film rotation as well as align them horizontally. The PF pattern was also measured with the EPID where the pickets were used to align the films vertically. Individual leaf positions were detected on the merged film for quantitative analysis. Various MLC positioning errors were introduced to evaluate the technique's sensitivity.

resultsThe merged films covered 72 leaf pairs properly (four leaf pairs on both sides were outside the treatment couch). With the EPID, the leaf positioning accuracy was -0.02 ± 0.07 mm (maximum: 0.29 mm) and the picket width variation was 0.00 ± 0.03 mm (maximum: 0.11 mm); with the films, the position accuracy and width variation were -0.03 ± 0.13 mm (maximum: 0.80 mm) and 0.00 ± 0.13 mm (maximum: 0.74 mm), respectively. The EPID was able to detect errors of 0.5 mm or above with submillimeter accuracy; the films were only able to detect errors > 1.0 mm.

conclusionWe developed a quantitative technique for the PF test on the Elekta Unity. The merged films covered nearly the entire MLC leaf banks. The technique exhibited clinically acceptable accuracy and sensitivity to MLC positioning errors.

Indexed as

Particle AcceleratorsQuality Assurance, Health CareRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedFilm DosimetryHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasmsPhantoms, ImagingElekta UnityMLC positioning accuracyMR‐linacPicket Fence test

Identifiers

PMID38467039
PMCPMC11244661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.