Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38466983›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2024

Machine Learning Model for Readmission Prediction of Patients With Heart Failure Based on Electronic Health Records: Protocol for a Quasi-Experimental Study for Impact Assessment.

Monika Nair, Lina E Lundgren, Amira Soliman, Petra Dryselius, Ebba Fogelberg, Marcus Petersson, Omar Hamed, Miltiadis Triantafyllou, Jens Nygren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Monika NairSchool of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7610-0954
Lina E LundgrenSchool of Business, Innovation and Sustainability, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2513-3040
Amira SolimanSchool of Information Technology, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0264-8762
Petra DryseliusCambio Healthcare Systems AB, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1345-2710
Ebba FogelbergCambio Healthcare Systems AB, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8286-2435
Marcus PeterssonCambio Healthcare Systems AB, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7530-5138
Omar HamedSchool of Information Technology, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2330-2580
Miltiadis TriantafyllouClinical Cardiology at Halmstad Hospital, Halmstad, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0659-4355
Jens NygrenSchool of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3576-2393

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCare for patients with heart failure (HF) causes a substantial load on health care systems where a prominent challenge is the elevated rate of readmissions within 30 days following initial discharge. Clinical professionals face high levels of uncertainty and subjectivity in the decision-making process on the optimal timing of discharge. Unwanted hospital stays generate costs and cause stress to patients and potentially have an impact on care outcomes. Recent studies have aimed to mitigate the uncertainty by developing and testing risk assessment tools and predictive models to identify patients at risk of readmission, often using novel methods such as machine learning (ML).

objectiveThis study aims to investigate how a developed clinical decision support (CDS) tool alters the decision-making processes of health care professionals in the specific context of discharging patients with HF, and if so, in which ways. Additionally, the aim is to capture the experiences of health care practitioners as they engage with the system's outputs to analyze usability aspects and obtain insights related to future implementation.

methodsA quasi-experimental design with randomized crossover assessment will be conducted with health care professionals on HF patients' scenarios in a region located in the South of Sweden. In total, 12 physicians and nurses will be randomized into control and test groups. The groups shall be provided with 20 scenarios of purposefully sampled patients. The clinicians will be asked to take decisions on the next action regarding a patient. The test group will be provided with the 10 scenarios containing patient data from electronic health records and an outcome from an ML-based CDS model on the risk level for readmission of the same patients. The control group will have 10 other scenarios without the CDS model output and containing only the patients' data from electronic medical records. The groups will switch roles for the next 10 scenarios. This study will collect data through interviews and observations. The key outcome measures are decision consistency, decision quality, work efficiency, perceived benefits of using the CDS model, reliability, validity, and confidence in the CDS model outcome, integrability in the routine workflow, ease of use, and intention to use. This study will be carried out in collaboration with Cambio Healthcare Systems.

resultsThe project is part of the Center for Applied Intelligent Systems Research Health research profile, funded by the Knowledge Foundation (2021-2028). Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Swedish ethical review authority (2022-07287-02). The recruitment process of the clinicians and the patient scenario selection will start in September 2023 and last till March 2024.

conclusionsThis study protocol will contribute to the development of future formative evaluation studies to test ML models with clinical professionals. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/52744.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceCHFclinical decision supportclinicianclinicianscongestive heart failuredecision-making processEHRelectronic health recordelectronic health recordsheart failuremachine learningmachine learning modelnursenursesphysicianpredictionpredictive modelpredictive modelsquasi-experimental studyreadmissionreadmission predictionrisk assessmentrisk assessment toolSweden

Identifiers

PMID38466983
PMCPMC10964136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.