Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38466971›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

Designing an App to Support Measurement-Based Peer Supervision of Frontline Health Workers Delivering Brief Psychosocial Interventions in Texas: Multimethod Study.

Anubhuti Poudyal, Delta-Marie Lewis, Sarah Taha, Alyssa J Martinez, Lauren Magoun, Y Xian Ho, Natali Carmio, John A Naslund, Katherine Sanchez, Neal Lesh and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07082010 (A Novel Digital Platform for Measurement-based Peer Supervision of Non-specialist Providers Conducting Brief Psychological Interventions), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07082010 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Novel Digital Platform for Measurement-based Peer Supervision of Non-specialist Providers Conducting Brief Psychological Interventions

TypeinterventionalSponsorDimagi Inc.Ran2025 to 2026Enrolled55ConditionsTraining of Mental Health Professionals, Training of Frontline Health WorkersArmsMBPS App
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anubhuti PoudyalDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6426-2646
Delta-Marie LewisDimagi, Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5707-1796
Sarah TahaDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8199-7978
Alyssa J MartinezDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4493-0472
Lauren MagounDimagi, Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4073-5071
Y Xian HoDimagi, Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1885-6136
Natali CarmioDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2399-5982
John A NaslundDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6777-0104
Katherine SanchezPatient and Community Engaged Research Center, Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2249-3024
Neal LeshDimagi, Inc, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0027-3247
Vikram PatelDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1066-8584

Funding

Social Determinants of HIVT32MH128395 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Gina Maria Wingood · 2021 to 2026
$1.4M
A novel digital platform for measurement-based peer supervision of non-specialist providers conducting brief psychological interventionsR43MH130305 · NIMH · DIMAGI, INC. · PI HO, Y. XIAN, LESH, NEAL · 2022 to 2022
$259k
NIMH NIH HHS R43 MH130305NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH128395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe unmet need for mental health care affects millions of Americans. A growing body of evidence in implementation science supports the effectiveness of task sharing in the delivery of brief psychosocial interventions. The digitization of training and processes supporting supervision can rapidly scale up task-shared interventions and enable frontline health workers (FLWs) to learn, master, and deliver interventions with quality and support.

objectiveWe aimed to assess the perceived feasibility and acceptability of a novel mobile and web app designed and adapted to support the supervision, training, and quality assurance of FLWs delivering brief psychosocial interventions.

methodsWe followed human-centered design principles to adapt a prototype app for FLWs delivering brief psychosocial interventions for depression, drawing from an app previously designed for use in rural India. Using a multimethod approach, we conducted focus group sessions comprising usability testing and group interviews with FLWs recruited from a large health system in Texas to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the app. The positive System Usability Scale was used to determine the app's overall usability. We also calculated the participants' likelihood of recommending the app to others using ratings of 0 to 10 from least to most likely (net promoter score). Focus group transcripts were coded and analyzed thematically, and recommendations were summarized across 4 key domains.

resultsA total of 18 FLWs varying in role and experience with client care participated in the study. Participants found the app to be usable, with an average System Usability Scale score of 72.5 (SD 18.1), consistent with the industry benchmark of 68. Participants' likelihood of recommending the app ranged from 5 to 10, yielding a net promoter score of 0, indicating medium acceptability. Overall impressions of the app from participants were positive. Most participants (15/18, 83%) found the app easy to access and navigate. The app was considered important to support FLWs in delivering high-quality mental health care services. Participants felt that the app could provide more structure to FLW training and supervision processes through the systematic collection and facilitation of performance-related feedback. Key concerns included privacy-related and time constraints regarding implementing a separate peer supervision mechanism that may add to FLWs' workloads.

conclusionsWe designed, built, and tested a usable, functional mobile and web app prototype that supports FLW-delivered psychosocial interventions in the United States through a structured supervision mechanism and systematic collection and review of performance measures. The app has the potential to scale the work of FLWs tasked with delivering these interventions to the hardest-to-reach communities they serve. The results of this project will inform future work to evaluate the app's use and efficacy in real-world settings to support task-shared mental health programs across the United States.

Indexed as

depressiondigital technologymental healthnonspecialist providerspeer supervisiontask sharingtherapy quality

Identifiers

PMID38466971
PMCPMC10964140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.