Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38466940›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2024

Predicting five-year interval second breast cancer risk in women with prior breast cancer.

Rebecca A Hubbard, Yu-Ru Su, Erin J A Bowles, Laura Ichikawa, Karla Kerlikowske, Kathryn P Lowry, Diana L Miglioretti, Anna N A Tosteson, Karen J Wernli, Janie M Lee

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06445920 (Risk Factors Analysis for Clinical Important Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Based on LASSO and Stepwise Regression), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06445920 completednot on this map

Risk Factors Analysis for Clinical Important Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Based on LASSO and Stepwise Regression

TypeobservationalSponsorSixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled1,154ConditionsPostoperative Nausea and VomitingArmsNo Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Surveillance mammography in older women-should we press on?Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026
    Article
  3. Patient and Physician Perspectives on Using Risk Prediction to Support Breast Cancer Surveillance Decision Making.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rebecca A HubbardDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0879-0994
Yu-Ru SuKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6150-960X
Erin J A BowlesKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6287-7391
Laura IchikawaKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0882-6662
Karla KerlikowskeDepartments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8793-8779
Kathryn P LowryDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0840-7855
Diana L MigliorettiKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5547-1833
Anna N A TostesonThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice and Dartmouth Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7718-8943
Karen J WernliKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7945-0327
Janie M LeeDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6452-8168

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Fred W Kolling IV · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Risk-based Imaging Strategies to Improve Breast Cancer Surveillance OutcomesP01CA154292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Diana L Miglioretti · 2011 to 2026
$52.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA154292NCI NIH HHS P01CA154292NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnnual surveillance mammography is recommended for women with a personal history of breast cancer. Risk prediction models that estimate mammography failures such as interval second breast cancers could help to tailor surveillance imaging regimens to women's individual risk profiles.

methodsIn a cohort of women with a history of breast cancer receiving surveillance mammography in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium in 1996-2019, we used Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO)-penalized regression to estimate the probability of an interval second cancer (invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ) in the 1 year after a negative surveillance mammogram. Based on predicted risks from this one-year risk model, we generated cumulative risks of an interval second cancer for the five-year period after each mammogram. Model performance was evaluated using cross-validation in the overall cohort and within race and ethnicity strata.

resultsIn 173 290 surveillance mammograms, we observed 496 interval cancers. One-year risk models were well-calibrated (expected/observed ratio = 1.00) with good accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.64). Model performance was similar across race and ethnicity groups. The median five-year cumulative risk was 1.20% (interquartile range 0.93%-1.63%). Median five-year risks were highest in women who were under age 40 or pre- or perimenopausal at diagnosis and those with estrogen receptor-negative primary breast cancers.

conclusionsOur risk model identified women at high risk of interval second breast cancers who may benefit from additional surveillance imaging modalities. Risk models should be evaluated to determine if risk-guided supplemental surveillance imaging improves early detection and decreases surveillance failures.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammographyNeoplasms, Second PrimaryAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID38466940
PMCPMC11160498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.