ArticleHepatology communications2024
Validation of the revised electronic version of RUCAM for diagnosis of DILI in Chinese patients.
Article in Hepatology communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Common Causes of Drug-Induced Liver Injury in 2025.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Hepatotoxicity Assessment of Anshenbunao Syrup by Multi-Component Quantification In Vivo/In Vitro and Cell Biological Evaluations.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Analysis of risk factors for herb-induced liver injury: a retrospective study from China.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Acute liver failure caused by alkaloids from traditional Chinese medicine: A case report.World journal of hepatology · 2025Article
- Autoimmune Hepatitis and Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Japan.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Methods for causality assessment of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025Review
- Real-world data of Azvudine-induced hepatotoxicity among hospitalized COVID-19 patients in China: a retrospective case-control study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
aimsThe Revised Electronic Causality Assessment Method (RECAM), a computerized update of the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Methodology (RUCAM), was recently proposed. In this study, we validated and compared the utility of the RECAM and RUCAM in Chinese patients with a single conventional or herbal agent-induced liver injury.
methodsIn this retrospective multicenter cohort of well-established DILI and non-DILI patients from 5 centers in China, the diagnostic performance of the RUCAM and RECAM was compared by AUC analysis. The consistency was evaluated by weighted kappa. The major causes of discrepancy were explored.
resultsA total of 481 DILI and 100 non-DILI patients were included. In total, 62.6% of the DILI cases were induced by conventional agents, and 37.4% were induced by herbs. The RECAM had relatively higher AUC than RUCAM for overall [0.947 (0.926-0.964) vs. 0.867 (0.836-0.893), p=0.0016], conventional agents [0.923 (0.890-0.949) vs. 0.819 (0.775-0.858), p=0.0185], and herbs [0.972 (0.941-0.989) vs.0.911 (0.866-0.944), p=0.0199]. Latency, scores associated with hepatitis B, and hepatotoxicity information of the insulting drugs were the 3 main causes for the inconsistency between RECAM and RUCAM scores.
conclusionsThe RECAM had relatively better diagnostic performance than RUCAM, with a higher AUC for Chinese DILI patients. Timely updates of the LiverTox category and refinement of serum markers to exclude hepatitis B activity would further improve the applicability of RECAM in areas where the use of herbs and resolution of past HBV infections are common.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.