Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38466562›Full record

ArticleClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2024

Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis of Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DReSS) in Children: A Scoping Review.

Frances St George-Hyslop, Nicole Cherepacha, Bindiya Chugani, Yousef Alabdeen, Luis Fernando Sanchez-Espino, Quenby Mahood, Cathryn Sibbald, Ruud H J Verstegen

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Frances St George-HyslopTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nicole CherepachaTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Bindiya ChuganiDivision of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Yousef AlabdeenDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Luis Fernando Sanchez-EspinoDivision of Dermatology, Department of Paediatrics, Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Quenby MahoodHospital Library, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Cathryn SibbaldDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ruud H J VerstegenDivision of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada. ruud.verstegen@sickkids.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective treatment of drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DReSS) requires early diagnosis and close monitoring. Diagnosing DReSS is especially challenging in children due to a low incidence rate, heterogeneous clinical presentation, and a lack of (pediatric) diagnostic criteria and clinical practice guidelines. We performed a scoping review, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, to summarize the clinical presentation and diagnostic process of DReSS in children (aged 0-18 years). Data from 644 individuals showed that DReSS manifests differently in children compared to adults. Children have a higher number of organs involved, including higher rates of cardiac and respiratory involvement compared to adults. Children < 6 years of age appear more prone to develop neurologic symptoms. Conversely, eosinophilia, edema, and kidney involvement are less frequently observed in children. Anti-seizure medications are by far the most common causative drug class, but the range of implicated drugs increases as children get older. This study highlights that children with DReSS not only differ from adults but also that differences exist between children of different ages. As such, there is a need to establish pediatric-specific diagnostic criteria. These efforts will promote earlier diagnosis of DReSS and likely lead to improved clinical care offered to children and their families.

Indexed as

Drug Hypersensitivity SyndromeAdolescentAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornDrug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DReSS)Pediatric DReSSScoping reviewSevere cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.