ArticleCardiovascular toxicology2024
Association Between Cancer and Cardiovascular Toxicity: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study on NHANES 1999-2018.
Article in Cardiovascular toxicology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of cardiovascular disease on cancer: observational and mendelian randomization analyses.Scientific reports · 2024Observational
- Effects of home-based exercise with telehealth guidance in lymphoma cancer survivors entering cardio-oncology rehabilitation: rationale and design of the tele@home study.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a dearth of evidence pertaining to the relationship of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and its subtype with adjudicated cancer, thereby limiting our understanding of the heightened risk of CVD resulting from long-term complications of cancer and its therapies. The aim of this study was to quantify the risks of CVD and its subtypes in adult cancer survivors compared with cancer-free controls in a nationwide cross-sectional study on Continuous National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). We included 44,442 participants ranging in age from 20 to 85 years. Cancer and CVD diagnoses were ascertained via the household questionnaires. The association of cancer status with the risk of CVD and CVD subtype was examined using weighted logistic regression. Stratification analyses were also performed by age, sex, race, marital status, income status, educational level, and hyperlipidemia. The Wald test was used to calculate P-value for interaction. A total of 4178 participants have cancer, while 4829 participants had CVD, respectively. In the multivariable-adjusted model, the cancer was consistently linked to an elevated risk of CVD. Stratification analyses showed that stronger association between cancer status and CVD risk was found in younger adults, non-white, and participants living without a spouse or partner, and without hyperlipidemia. Our study confirmed that cancer participants were strongly linked to living with CVD, independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors, especially in younger adults, non-white, and participants living without a spouse or partner, and without hyperlipidemia. There exists a pressing requirement to establish effective strategies for the prevention of CVD within this population characterized by a heightened risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38466544What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.