Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38466540›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2024

Endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration: effectiveness and accuracy in non-small cell lung cancer staging.

Maria Giovanna Mastromarino, Elena Guerrini, Giacomo Rabazzi, Diana Bacchin, Alessandro Picchi, Olivia Fanucchi, Vittorio Aprile, Stylianos Korasidis, Greta Alì, Alessandro Ribechini and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Maria Giovanna Mastromarino *Division of Thoracic Surgery, Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9291-5619
Elena Guerrini *Division of Thoracic Surgery, Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. elena.guerrini.pi@gmail.com.
Giacomo RabazziDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Diana BacchinThoracic Endoscopy Unit, Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Alessandro PicchiThoracic Endoscopy Unit, Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Olivia FanucchiThoracic Endoscopy Unit, Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Vittorio AprileDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Stylianos KorasidisDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Greta AlìDepartment of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Alessandro RibechiniThoracic Endoscopy Unit, Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Marco LucchiDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Marcello Carlo AmbrogiDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEndobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has a cardinal role in the diagnosis and staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), providing an accurate nodal staging in a less invasive way than surgical biopsy. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA in the pre-operative NSCLC mediastinal staging, as well as to evaluate EBUS-TBNA specificity and sensibility in our cohort.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed data of NSCLC patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA followed by major pulmonary resection between January 2020 and December 2022. EBUS-TBNA was performed in patients with NSCLC (central T ≤ 3 cm, peripheral/central T > 3 cm), following the ESTS guidelines. The target nodes were selected on the basis of their radiologic/metabolic characteristics. Each procedure was conducted together with rapid on-site cytological evaluation (ROSE).

resultsTwenty-five patients were included (M/F = 17/8). At least three needle passages on each target lymph node were performed. No complications during or after the procedures occurred. We found a 100% correspondence between ROSE on the sampled nodes and postoperative pathologic findings. An upstaging occurred in three cases (12%) because of the involvement of stations 5 and 6 (not accessible via EBUS), while the only case of downstaging (N2 → N0, 4%) was probably due to intercurrent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In all cases, EBUS-TBNA has proved to achieve a diagnostic procedure on the target nodes.

conclusionsEBUS-TBNA is a safe and effective procedure that offers high sensitivity and specificity when performed together with ROSE, which improves the accuracy of sampling. Doubt on nodal stations 5 and 6 involvement should be settled by other techniques.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationLung NeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingSensitivity and SpecificityAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesEndobronchial ultrasoundMediastinal stagingNon-small cell lung cancerRapid on-site cytological evaluationTransbronchial needle aspiration

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.