Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38466497›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2024

Long-term geometric quality assurance of radiation focal point and cone-beam computed tomography for Gamma Knife radiosurgery system.

Shingo Ohira, Toshikazu Imae, Masanari Minamitani, Atsuto Katano, Atsushi Aoki, Takeshi Ohta, Motoyuki Umekawa, Yuki Shinya, Hirotaka Hasegawa, Teiji Nishio and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Shingo OhiraDepartment of Comprehensive Radiation Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan. ohira-shingo@outlook.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6170-1471
Toshikazu ImaeDepartment of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masanari MinamitaniDepartment of Comprehensive Radiation Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Atsuto KatanoDepartment of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi AokiDepartment of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi OhtaDepartment of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Motoyuki UmekawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuki ShinyaDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirotaka HasegawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Teiji NishioDepartment of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Masahiko KoizumiDepartment of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Hideomi YamashitaDepartment of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuhito SaitoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Keiichi NakagawaDepartment of Comprehensive Radiation Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI 21K07742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the geometric accuracy of the radiation focal point (RFP) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) over long-term periods for the ICON Leksell Gamma Knife radiosurgery system. This phantom study utilized the ICON quality assurance tool plus, and the phantom was manually set on the patient position system before the implementation of treatment for patients. The deviation of the RFP position from the unit center point (UCP) and the positions of the four ball bearings (BBs) in the CBCT from the reference position were automatically analyzed. During 544 days, a total of 269 analyses were performed on different days. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of the deviation between measured RFP and UCP was 0.01 ± 0.03, 0.01 ± 0.03, and -0.01 ± 0.01 mm in the X, Y, and Z directions, respectively. The deviations with offset values after the cobalt-60 source replacement (0.00 ± 0.03, -0.01 ± 0.01, and -0.01 ± 0.01 mm in the X, Y, and Z directions, respectively) were significantly (p = 0.001) smaller than those before the replacement (0.02 ± 0.03, 0.02 ± 0.01, and -0.02 ± 0.01 mm in the X, Y, and Z directions, respectively). The overall mean ± SD of four BBs was -0.03 ± 0.03, -0.01 ± 0.05, and 0.01 ± 0.03 mm in the X, Y, and Z directions, respectively. Geometric positional accuracy was ensured to be within 0.1 mm on most days over a long-term period of more than 500 days.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyPhantoms, ImagingRadiosurgeryHumansQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality ControlTime FactorsAccuracyCBCTGamma KnifeICONRadiation focal point

Identifiers

PMID38466497
PMCPMC11128398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.