Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38466439›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2024

Predictors of recurrence and long-term patient reported outcomes following surgical repair of anal fistula, a retrospective analysis.

Sidrah Khan, Rebecca Kotcher, Paul Herman, Li Wang, Robert Tessler, Kellie Cunningham, James Celebrezze, David Medich, Jennifer Holder-Murray

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sidrah Khan *Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufmann Medical Building, Suite 603, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Rebecca Kotcher *Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufmann Medical Building, Suite 603, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Paul HermanDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Li WangDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufmann Medical Building, Suite 603, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Robert TesslerDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufmann Medical Building, Suite 603, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Kellie CunninghamDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufmann Medical Building, Suite 603, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
James CelebrezzeDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufmann Medical Building, Suite 603, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
David MedichDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufmann Medical Building, Suite 603, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Jennifer Holder-MurrayDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufmann Medical Building, Suite 603, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. holdermurrayjm@upmc.edu.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurgery for anal fistulas can result in devastating complications, including reoperations and fecal incontinence. There is limited contemporary evidence comparing outcomes since the adoption of the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure into mainstream practice. The purpose of this study is to compare recurrence rates and long-term outcomes of anal fistula following repair.

methodsData was collected from the electronic medical records or patient reported outcomes from patients aged 18 or older with a primary or recurrent cryptoglandular anal fistula. Primary outcome was recurrence defined as the identification of at least one fistula os or a high clinical suspicion of anal fistula. Secondary outcomes included fecal incontinence and postoperative quality of life.

resultsA total of 171 patients underwent definitive surgical repairs for their anal fistula. So 66.5% had a simple fistula, and 33.5% had a complex fistula. Of the 171 patients, 12.5% had a recurrence. The recurrence rates were 5.9% for simple fistula and 25.4% for complex fistula. Predictors of recurrence included diabetes mellitus, history of anorectal abscess, complex fistula, and sphincter sparing surgery. LIFT or plug/biologic procedures were both associated with a 50% or greater recurrence rate. No significant differences were found in fecal incontinence or associated quality of life between sphincter sparing or non-sphincter sparing surgical resections.

conclusionThe study provides insights into the long-term outcomes of surgical repair for anal fistula. We demonstrate that sphincter sparing operations are associated with increased recurrence, meanwhile, non-sphincter sparing surgeries did not increase the risk of fecal incontinence or worsen quality of life.

Indexed as

Fecal IncontinenceRectal FistulaAnal CanalHumansLigationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOrgan Sparing TreatmentsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnalFistulaIncontinenceLIFTSphincterotomy

Identifiers

PMID38466439
PMCPMC10927793
OpenAlexW4392647009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.