Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38466398›Full record

ArticleUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Prevention of recurrence of urolithiasis].

Roswitha Siener, Johannes Stein, Manuel Ritter

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Roswitha SienerUniversitäres Steinzentrum, Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland. Roswitha.Siener@ukbonn.de.
Johannes SteinUniversitäres Steinzentrum, Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.
Manuel RitterUniversitäres Steinzentrum, Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urolithiasis is one of the most frequent urological diseases. Identifying the causes of stone formation forms the basis for successful prevention of recurrence. Metabolic diagnostics and measures for prevention of recurrence are based on the assignment of the patient to a low-risk or high-risk group. Analysis of the urinary calculi is an essential prerequisite for identifying patients at risk. The general recommendations on diet and lifestyle are considered to be the basis of treatment. Depending on the type of stone and the individual biochemical risk profile of a patient, these general measures should be supplemented by targeted medical nutrition therapy and pharmacological treatment. Mixed stones can pose a challenge for the treatment and prevention of recurrence. A personalized treatment decision that takes the various components of mixed stones into account could further improve the prevention of recurrence of urolithiasis.

Indexed as

Urinary CalculiUrolithiasisDietary SupplementsHumansRisk FactorsCalcium oxalateDietMedicationStone compositionUrinary calculi

Identifiers

PMID38466398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.