Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38466233›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2024

Virtual follow-up care among breast and prostate cancer patients during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic: Association with distress.

Jacqueline L Bender, Sarah Scruton, Geoff Wong, Nazek Abdelmutti, Alejandro Berlin, Julie Easley, Zhihui Amy Liu, Sharon McGee, Danielle Rodin, Jonathan Sussman and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacqueline L BenderCancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship, Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1501-335X
Sarah ScrutonCancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship, Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Geoff WongNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nazek AbdelmuttiCancer Quality Lab (CQual), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alejandro BerlinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Julie EasleyDepartment of Medical Education, Horizon Health Network, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.
Zhihui Amy LiuDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sharon McGeeDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Danielle RodinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jonathan SussmanDepartment of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Robin UrquhartDepartment of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CADalhousie University · CAHorizon Health Network · CAMcMaster University · CAUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

CIHR TT7-128272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to investigate associations between self-reported distress (anxiety/depression) and satisfaction with and desire for virtual follow-up (VFU) care among cancer patients during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsBreast and prostate cancer patients receiving VFU at an urban cancer centre in Toronto, Canada completed an online survey on their sociodemographic, clinical, and technology, characteristics and experience with and views on VFU. EQ5D-5 L was used to assess distress. Statistical models adjusted for age, gender, education, income and Internet confidence.

resultsOf 352 participants, average age was 65 years, 48% were women,79% were within 5 years of treatment completion, 84% had college/university education and 74% were confident Internet users. Nearly, all (98%) had a virtual visit via phone and 22% had a virtual visit via video. The majority of patients (86%) were satisfied with VFU and 70% agreed that they would like VFU options after the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants who reported distress and who were not confident using the Internet for health purposes were significantly less likely to be satisfied with VFU (OR = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2-0.8 and OR = 0.19; 95% CI: 0.09-0.38, respectively) and were less likely to desire VFU option after the COVID-19 pandemic (OR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.30-0.82 and OR = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.23-0.70, respectively).

conclusionsThe majority of respondents were satisfied with VFU and would like VFU options after the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research should determine how to optimize VFU options for cancer patients who are distressed and who are less confident using virtual care technology.

Indexed as

COVID-19Prostatic NeoplasmsAftercareAgedBreastHumansMalePandemicscancerdigital healthdistressfollow-up caresurvivorship carevirtual care

Identifiers

PMID38466233
PMCPMC10926960
OpenAlexW4392664592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.