ArticleBiology open2024
Machine learning models reveal distinct disease subgroups and improve diagnostic and prognostic accuracy for individuals with pathogenic SCN8A gain-of-function variants.
Article in Biology open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning, Large Language Models, and Multimodal AI for Diagnosing Pediatric Rare Diseases: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- A research roadmap for SCN8A-related disorders: addressing knowledge gaps and aligning research priorities across stakeholders.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Global Thyroid Cancer Patterns and Predictive Analytics: Integrating Machine Learning for Advanced Diagnostic Modelling.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Machine Learning-Based Identification of High-Risk Patterns in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Outcomes.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Distinguishing clinical subgroups for patients suffering with diseases characterized by a wide phenotypic spectrum is essential for developing precision therapies. Patients with gain-of-function (GOF) variants in the SCN8A gene exhibit substantial clinical heterogeneity, viewed historically as a linear spectrum ranging from mild to severe. To test for hidden clinical subgroups, we applied two machine-learning algorithms to analyze a dataset of patient features collected by the International SCN8A Patient Registry. We used two research methodologies: a supervised approach that incorporated feature severity cutoffs based on clinical conventions, and an unsupervised approach employing an entirely data-driven strategy. Both approaches found statistical support for three distinct subgroups and were validated by correlation analyses using external variables. However, distinguishing features of the three subgroups within each approach were not concordant, suggesting a more complex phenotypic landscape. The unsupervised approach yielded strong support for a model involving three partially ordered subgroups rather than a linear spectrum. Application of these machine-learning approaches may lead to improved prognosis and clinical management of individuals with SCN8A GOF variants and provide insights into the underlying mechanisms of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.