ArticleBiometrics2024
Merging or ensembling: integrative analysis in multiple neuroimaging studies.
Article in Biometrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computation and resource efficient genome-wide association analysis for large-scale imaging studies.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Computation and resource efficient genome-wide association analysis for large-scale imaging studies.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to systematically investigate merging and ensembling methods for spatially varying coefficient mixed effects models (SVCMEM) in order to carry out integrative learning of neuroimaging data obtained from multiple biomedical studies. The "merged" approach involves training a single learning model using a comprehensive dataset that encompasses information from all the studies. Conversely, the "ensemble" approach involves creating a weighted average of distinct learning models, each developed from an individual study. We systematically investigate the prediction accuracy of the merged and ensemble learners under the presence of different degrees of interstudy heterogeneity. Additionally, we establish asymptotic guidelines for making strategic decisions about when to employ either of these models in different scenarios, along with deriving optimal weights for the ensemble learner. To validate our theoretical results, we perform extensive simulation studies. The proposed methodology is also applied to 3 large-scale neuroimaging studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.