Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38465850›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine

Effect of institutional antimicrobial stewardship guidelines on prescription of critically important antimicrobials for dogs and cats.

Sarah N Robbins, Robert Goggs, Sydney Kraus-Malett, Laura Goodman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah N RobbinsCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3399-8209
Robert GoggsCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7446-6987
Sydney Kraus-MalettCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Laura GoodmanCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.

Funding

Lab-supported Antimicrobial Stewardship at the Cornell University Hospital for AnimalsU18FD006992 · FDA · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI ALTIER, CRAIG, GOGGS, ROBERT · 2020 to 2020
$41k
CDC HHS 6NU50CK000516-04-02FDA HHS U18 FD006992Food & Drug Administration (FDA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) 1U18FD006992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVeterinary hospital antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) guidelines might help combat antimicrobial resistance (AMR).

objectivesDetermine the conditions and types of infection for which antimicrobial drugs (AMDs) deemed critically important (CIA) by the World Health Organization (WHO) were prescribed and assess the effect of hospital AMS guidelines on adherence to International Society for Companion Animal Infectious Diseases published guidelines for the treatment of superficial bacterial folliculitis, respiratory tract disease and urinary tract infection in these cases. ANIMALS: Dogs and cats managed at an academic veterinary hospital from 1/21 to 6/21 and 9/21 to 6/22.

methodsPrescriptions of cephalosporins (third or fourth generation), glycopeptides, macrolides/ketolides, polymyxins, and quinolones were identified. Data on culture and susceptibility (C/S) testing and previous AMD exposure were collected. Frequencies were compared between time periods using Fisher's exact test with Bonferroni corrections.

resultsIn animals prescribed ≥1 WHO-CIA AMD, fluoroquinolones were the most frequently prescribed WHO-CIA class in dogs (567/1724, 32.9%) and cats (192/450, 42.7%). No animals were prescribed carbapenems, dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors/sulfonamides, or polymyxins. No cats were prescribed aminoglycosides or amphenicols. Institutional guidelines were followed in 57.8% (324/561) cases. The most frequent causes of nonadherence were failure to perform C/S testing 46.0% (109/237) and unnecessary use of a higher-tier AMD 43.0% (102/237). Bacterial C/S testing was more frequently performed after AMS guideline institution (59.7% vs. 46.8%, P = 0.0006). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Adherence to published guidelines remained poor despite an increase in C/S testing. There were no changes in the frequencies of confirmed infections, positive cultures or AMD resistance between time periods.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipCat DiseasesDog DiseasesAnimalsCatsDogsGuideline AdherenceHospitals, AnimalPractice Guidelines as TopicAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibioticscultureresistancesensitivityveterinary

Identifiers

PMID38465850
PMCPMC11099728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.