Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38465627›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2024

"People want better": a qualitative exploration of stakeholders' views on introducing well-being coordinators in the screen industry.

John Goodwin, Eleanor McSherry, Ryan Goulding, James O'Mahony, Rachael O'Callaghan, Ciara Chambers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

John GoodwinCatherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2044-1861
Eleanor McSherryAdult and Continuing Education, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7088-9648
Ryan GouldingCatherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8121-5393
James O'MahonyCatherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7101-7016
Rachael O'CallaghanCatherine McAuley School of Nursing and Midwifery, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Ciara ChambersDepartment of Film & Screen Media, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2003-100X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere are several factors that negatively impact the well-being of those working in the screen industry. Consequently, the need to introduce Well-being Coordinators has been identified. This study explored the experiences of participants who undertook a Well-being Coordination course tailored for the screen sector. Additionally, it sought to delve into perspectives regarding well-being within the screen industry.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted. The study was guided by an interpretive descriptive approach. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse data.

findingsFive themes were identified: Opportunities and challenges working in the screen industry, co-existing with harassment, the need for change: importance of wellbeing, becoming a well-being co-ordinator: learning from the course, and the future of the well-being co-ordinator role: opportunities and challenges. The reality that cast and crew co-exist with several forms of harassment within the industry was noted. Despite this, there is hope for the future of the screen sector, particularly the positive impact the role of the Well-being Coordinator could have.

conclusionsThe experiences of professionals across the screen industry vary; however, a pervasive culture of bullying and harassment is commonplace. Through the introduction of Well-being Coordinators, there is the potential to enact positive change.

Indexed as

Stakeholder ParticipationHumansQualitative ResearchCreative industryfilminterpretive descriptionmental healthqualitativescreen industryTVwell-being

Identifiers

PMID38465627
PMCPMC10930092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.