Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38465600›Full record

ReviewInnovations (Philadelphia, Pa.)

The Perceval Sutureless Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve: Evolution of Surgical Valve Technology.

Nicholas M Fialka, Ryaan El-Andari, Shaohua Wang, Aleksander Dokollari, William D T Kent, Ali Fatehi Hassanabad

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas M FialkaDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Ryaan El-AndariDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7146-4337
Shaohua WangDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Aleksander DokollariSection of Cardiac Surgery, St. Boniface Hospital, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
William D T KentSection of Cardiac Surgery, Division of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3808-0777
Ali Fatehi HassanabadSection of Cardiac Surgery, Division of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAUniversity of Calgary · CASt. Boniface Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe surgical treatment of aortic stenosis continues to evolve, and sutureless aortic valve replacement (SUAVR) is an emerging technology. With the Perceval S (Corcym, London, UK) as the only true sutureless valve on the market, the objective of this review is to analyze the current literature on Perceval S. Focusing on valve design and deployment as well as applications of the technology for challenging pathology, clinical outcomes are assessed, including a comparison with transcatheter AVR (TAVR).

methodsPubMed and MEDLINE were searched by 3 authors for studies analyzing SUAVR from inception to May 19, 2023.

resultsSUAVR facilitates minimally invasive surgery and offers an alternative strategy for patients with small aortic annuli. It also has a time-saving advantage for patients who require complex operations. SUAVR results in excellent long-term morbidity, mortality, durability, and hemodynamic function. In comparison with conventional surgical AVR (SAVR), SUAVR does have a greater risk of postoperative pacemaker implantation; however, increasing user experience and refinements in implantation technique have contributed to reductions in this outcome. SUAVR results in morbidity and mortality that is similar to rapid-deployment AVR. Midterm outcomes are superior to TAVR; however, further robust investigation into all of these comparisons is ultimately necessary.

conclusionsSUAVR bridges the gap in technology between SAVR and TAVR. The application of this exciting technology will undoubtedly grow in the coming years, during which additional investigation is paramount to optimize preoperative planning, valve deployment, and reintervention strategies.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisBioprosthesisHeart Valve ProsthesisSutureless Surgical ProceduresTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresProsthesis DesignTreatment Outcomeminimally invasive aortic valve replacementrapid deployment aortic valve replacementsutureless aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

PMID38465600
PMCPMC11055413
OpenAlexW4392647569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.