Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38465302›Full record

ArticlePhysiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada2024

Patient, Family, Caregiver, and Community Engagement in Research: A Sensibility Evaluation of a Novel Infographic and Planning Guide.

Andrew Theodore Giannini, Megan Leong, Kelvin Chan, Arman Ghaltaei, Eden Graham, Craig Robinson, Malvina N Skorska, Andrea Cross, Sharon Gabison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Developing an Inclusive Dance Guide for Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Co-Design Process and Initial Feasibility Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrew Theodore GianniniDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Megan LeongDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kelvin ChanDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Arman GhaltaeiDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eden GrahamDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Craig RobinsonDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Malvina N SkorskaChild & Youth Psychiatry, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrea CrossSchool of Rehabilitation Science, Department of Paediatrics, CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University and the Institute of Applied Health Sciences, CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Sharon GabisonDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Engaging patients, families, caregivers, and the community (PFCCs) throughout the research cycle ensures that research is meaningful for the target population. Although tools have been developed to promote PFCC engagement, many are lengthy, complex, and lack recommended behaviours. This study evaluated the sensibility of an infographic and accompanying planning guide for facilitating engagement of PFCCs in research. Methods: Thirteen rehabilitation researchers reviewed the PFCC engagement tool and planning guide, participated in a semi-structured interview, and completed a 10-item sensibility questionnaire. Interviews were transcribed, imported into NVivo, and analyzed using direct content analysis. Median scores and proportions of responses for each of the 10 items in the questionnaire were calculated. Results: Median scores for all questionnaire items were ≥ 4 on a 7-point Likert Scale. Participants reported the tool was easy to navigate, contained relevant items to promote PFCC engagement, and followed a logical sequence. Suggested modifications of the tool related to formatting, design, and changing the title. Conclusions: The tool was deemed sensible for overt format, purpose and framework, face and content validity, and ease of usage and provides guidance to engage PFCCs across the research cycle. Further studies are recommended to assess the effectiveness of the tool to engage PFCCs in research.

Indexed as

community-based participatory researchqualitative researchrehabilitation researchreliabilityvalidity

Identifiers

PMID38465302
PMCPMC10919359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.