ArticleCureus2024
Navigating Congenital Nasal Obstruction: A Contemporary Surgical Paradigm.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An uncommon form of nasal airway obstruction in a newborn with respiratory distress manifestations that needs prompt surgical correction when medical therapy cannot address the problem adequately. In this case study, two newborns were diagnosed with congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis (CNPAS) following a CT paranasal sinuses when the infant demonstrated persistent symptoms of upper airway obstruction. The narrowing of the nasal pyriform aperture, with a mean width of 0.65 cm in these newborns, was insufficient to allow breathing through the nostrils. Bedsides flexible endoscopy examinations revealed laryngomalacia in both of these infants. A supraglottoplasty, surgical nasal dilation, and stenting were performed without requiring a sublabial drill out of the pyriform aperture, allowing total resolution of the initial respiratory symptoms. Thus, a successful nasal enlargement was accomplished. During the post-operative follow-up period, no incurrences were observed. Both patients with CNPAS were successfully treated with nasal dilatation and nasal stenting instead of the traditional pyriform aperture bone removal by a sublabial approach. Despite being a small series, it demonstrates that nasal dilatation and stenting may be considered an alternate procedure in selective CNPAS cases because it lowers the risk of open surgery and presumably offers an effective management option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.