ArticleCureus2024
Latissimus Dorsi Flap Revisited: Coverage of Large Chest Wall Defects Following Mastectomy for Locally Advanced Breast Carcinoma and Angiosarcoma.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap (LDMF) remains a significant tool in the armamentarium of the oncoplastic breast surgeon. Despite declining popularity for reconstruction, owing to the increasing use of implants and free flaps, it still has an important role in certain salvage situations and as a flap to cover large defects. We report our experience with the use of LDMF for immediate coverage of large mastectomy defects when options are limited.
methodsRetrospective series of prospectively collected patient records. Patient and tumour characteristics, length of stay, and post-operative and oncologic outcomes are reported. Patients with angiosarcoma were discussed at tertiary sarcoma centres as per national guidelines. Operations were carried out by oncoplastic breast surgeons. The case series was approved by the institutional information governance department in line with institutional requirements for patient data sharing. All patients provided written consent for photography. Descriptive statistics were used to report findings. Median (IQR) was used for continuous variables.
resultsSix women were included, with a median age of 62.5 years, from December 2019 to October 2022. Follow-up ranged from 15 to 49 months. Median tumour size was 72.5 (16.25) mm. Four patients had locally advanced breast carcinoma (LABC), and two had breast angiosarcoma. The donor site and chest wall defects were closed primarily in all cases. Median length of stay was three nights. All mastectomy wounds healed without issues and any delay to their adjuvant treatment. One patient had a minor latissimus dorsi (LD) donor site wound breakdown managed conservatively. Three patients had adjuvant radiotherapy after surgery. Four patients, one after high-grade angiosarcoma and three after aggressive breast carcinoma, had a locoregional recurrence or distant metastases and succumbed within 20 months of surgery.
conclusionThe LDMF can be a reliable option for the primary closure of large post-mastectomy wounds. Its use can lead to timely wound healing, allowing patients to undergo adjuvant treatment without delay. However, the overall oncologic outcomes in patients with LABC and angiosarcoma are poor due to the underlying aggressive tumour biology. Long-term outcomes are to be interpreted with caution due to the small number of patients with diverse pathologic features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.