ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2023
[Advantages of simulation-based training in improving skills of beginners in interventional cardiology procedures: a Tunisian cross-sectional study].
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Simulation Training and Peripheral Angioplasty Learning: Protocol of a Quasi-Experimental Evaluative Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: simulator training in interventional cardiology (ST) is an educational tool that is rapidly spreading worldwide. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the advantages of ST in improving skills of beginners in interventional cardiology procedures, through a short training cycle. Methods: we conducted a before-and-after quasi-experimental evaluative study in the simulation center of the Faculty of Medicine in Sfax. We involved cardiology residents at the beginning of their training in interventional cardiology. All the participants attended a 4-hour training course on a Cathi Results: thirteen learners participated in our study. The performance score improved by a median of 216.12% (ISQ = 285%). This improvement was significantly greater for learners who had never had access to the catheterisation room. The performance score ranged from a median of 31 (ISQ=40.5) to a median of 120 (ISQ=19.7), (p=0.001). The competence score for coronary angiography improved significantly, from a median of 16 (ISQ=18) to a median of 70 (ISQ=6), (p=0.001). The competence score for angioplasty improved significantly from a median of 10 (ISQ=17) to a median of 50 (ISQ=13.7), p=0.001. Procedure time of coronary angiography and angioplasty were significantly shortened from 12 min (ISQ=2) to 7 min (ISQ=1) after the simulation cycle (p=0.001), and from a median of 19 min to a median of 17 min after simulation, p=0.002. Conclusion: despite a short-time simulation training, our pilot study demonstrates a significant improvement in the learners´ skills and performance, as well as a reduction in the time taken to carry out procedures and irradiation. This could eventually increase the number of procedures carried out daily in our cathlab and limit radiation exposure of staff and patients, while ensuring that the learners receive adequate training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.