Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38464996›Full record

ArticleNature reviews. Materials2022

Drug delivery to the central nervous system.

Elizabeth Nance, Suzie H Pun, Rajiv Saigal, Drew L Sellers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews. Materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 162 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
162citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

162 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Brain metastasis: Opportunities for novel therapies.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Fluorinated Amphiphilic Dendrimer to Improve PET Imaging of Cancer.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article

102 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth NanceDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Suzie H PunDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1443-4996
Rajiv SaigalDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Drew L SellersDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Repurposing of cancer therapeutics for treatment of patients with COVID-19 diseaseU54CA199090 · NCI · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI HEATH, JAMES R., RIBAS, ANTONI · 2015 to 2020
$11.4M
Ultrasound-aided gene transfer to direct cortical neurogenesis after brain injuryR01NS064404 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HORNER, PHILIP J, PUN, SUZIE H. · 2009 to 2018
$3.5M
Designed Vehicles for Blood Brain Barrier TraversalR01AG063845 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BAKER, DAVID · 2019 to 2023
$2.5M
Quantitative 3D imaging of in situ nanoparticle movement and cellular behavior during neuroinflammationR35GM124677 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI NANCE, ELIZABETH A · 2017 to 2022
$2.5M
POTENTIATING BREAST CANCER THERAPIES BY TARGETING TUMOR-ASSOCIATED MACROPHAGER01CA177272 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PUN, SUZIE H. · 2014 to 2019
$2.0M
Multimeric Peptide Copolymer Formulations for Targeted Drug Delivery to Treat Nervous System DisordersR01NS118247 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SELLERS, DREW L · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
Enzyme-loaded nanoparticles for neonatal neuroprotectionR21HD100639 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI NANCE, ELIZABETH A · 2020 to 2021
$437k
Targeting Ligands for autonomic uptake and drug delivery to the brain and spinal cordR21NS099654 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SELLERS, DREW L · 2017 to 2018
$427k
Synthetic nucleocapsids: a new peptide library platformR21CA232430 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KING, NEIL, PUN, SUZIE H. · 2018 to 2019
$366k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA177272NCI NIH HHS R21 CA232430NCI NIH HHS U54 CA199090NIA NIH HHS R01 AG063845NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD100639NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM124677NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS064404NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS118247NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS099654
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the rising global incidence of central nervous system (CNS) disorders, CNS drug development remains challenging, with high costs, long pathways to clinical use and high failure rates. The CNS is highly protected by physiological barriers, in particular, the blood-brain barrier and the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier, which limit access of most drugs. Biomaterials can be designed to bypass or traverse these barriers, enabling the controlled delivery of drugs into the CNS. In this Review, we first examine the effects of normal and diseased CNS physiology on drug delivery to the brain and spinal cord. We then discuss CNS drug delivery designs and materials that are administered systemically, directly to the CNS, intranasally or peripherally through intramuscular injections. Finally, we highlight important challenges and opportunities for materials design for drug delivery to the CNS and the anticipated clinical impact of CNS drug delivery.

Identifiers

PMID38464996
PMCPMC10923597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.