ArticleJournal of pain research2024
Pharmacopuncture Therapy as an Adjunctive Treatment for Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacopuncture therapy versus usual care for lumbar spinal stenosis: A randomized controlled trial.Integrative medicine research · 2026Article
- Effectiveness and safety of combining pharmacopuncture therapy and acupotomy for treating patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: A pragmatic, assessor-blinded, randomized, controlled trial.Integrative medicine research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Pharmacopuncture therapy (PPT) combines medicinal extracts with acupuncture and is widely used as an adjunct in clinical practice. This study assessed the safety and feasibility of PPT in addition to conventional Korean Medicine treatment (CKMT), including electroacupuncture, cupping and infra-red, for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Patients and Methods: Forty patients diagnosed with LSS were randomly assigned to undergo PPT with CKMT (experimental group) or CKMT alone (control group) at a 1:1 ratio, receiving 10 sessions of each intervention over five weeks. The primary clinical outcome was measured using the 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for buttock and leg pain five weeks post-treatment. Secondary outcomes included clinically important difference (CID), Zurich Claudication Questionnaire, self-reported walking capacity, Modified-Modified Schober test, EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level questionnaire, and the patient's global impression of change. The adverse events were assessed at each visit. The analysis of covariance was conducted to compare between two groups. Results: Intervention completion rates were 95% and 100% in the experimental and control groups, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between groups regarding the primary outcome (adjusted mean difference: 8.0; 95% confidence interval: -1.4-17.4). The mean difference in the 100-mm VAS for low back pain at week 5 (adjusted mean difference: 12.9; 95% confidence interval: 2.4-23.4) and the proportion of patients who reached the minimum CID was higher in the experimental group than in the control group. However, no significant differences were observed with other secondary outcomes. One patient in the experimental group experienced a systemic skin rash that resolved the same day, whereas the adverse events in the other group were mild and transient. Conclusion: This trial demonstrated the feasibility of add-on effects and the safety of pharmacopuncture in patients with LSS. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the add-on effects of PPT in treating LSS. Trial Registration: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS), KCT0007229; registered on April 26, 2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.