ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2024
On-site rapid detection of multiple pesticide residues in tea leaves by lateral flow immunoassay.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel Magnetic Covalent Organic Frameworks Fabricated Through In Situ Synthesis and Assembly for the Efficient Extraction and Enrichment of Six Amide Herbicides.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An Immunochromatographic Test Strip and Its Application in Rapid Screening of Pepper Mild Mottle Virus.Biosensors · 2026Article
- Sample preparation techniques for quality evaluation and safety control of medicinal and edible plants: Overview, advances, applications, and future perspectives.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025Review
- Field Application of Tea Volatiles Mediating the Selectivity ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative Assessment of Gold and Carbon Nanoparticles as Tags for Lateral Flow Immunoassay of Fenpropathrin in Green Tea.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- Development of colloidal carbon-based immunoassay for the determination of thiamethoxam in medicinal and edible Lonicerae Japonicae Flos.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Dual-Channel Colloidal Gold-Based Immunochromatographic Test Strip for Rapidly Differentiating Between Two Major Groups ofBiosensors · 2025Article
- Highly Sensitive Lateral Flow Immunodetection of the Insecticide Imidacloprid in Fruits and Berries Reached by Indirect Antibody-Label Coupling.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The application of pesticides (mostly insecticides and fungicides) during the tea-planting process will undoubtedly increase the dietary risk associated with drinking tea. Thus, it is necessary to ascertain whether pesticide residues in tea products exceed the maximum residue limits. However, the complex matrices present in tea samples comprise a major challenge in the analytical detection of pesticide residues. In this study, nine types of lateral flow immunochromatographic strips (LFICSs) were developed to detect the pesticides of interest (fenpropathrin, chlorpyrifos, imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, acetamiprid, carbendazim, chlorothalonil, pyraclostrobin, and iprodione). To reduce the interference of tea substrates on the assay sensitivity, the pretreatment conditions for tea samples, including the extraction solvent, extraction time, and purification agent, were optimized for the simultaneous detection of these pesticides. The entire testing procedure (including pretreatment and detection) could be completed within 30 min. The detected results of authentic tea samples were confirmed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS), which suggest that the LFICS coupled with sample rapid pretreatment can be used for on-site rapid screening of the target pesticide in tea products prior to their market release.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.