ArticleThe journal of cardiovascular aging2024
Long-term efficacy and safety of cardiac genome editing for catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.
Article in The journal of cardiovascular aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ca2+ signalling in cardiac muscle: the importance of balances.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Review
- Ryanodine receptor 2 mutations in catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia: From molecular mechanisms to precision medicine.World journal of cardiology · 2026Review
- Advances that position intracellular calcium dysregulation as an emerging therapeutic target in heart disease.Heart rhythm · 2025Article
- Genetics, manifestations, and management of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.Current opinion in cardiology · 2025Review
- Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia: Advancing From Molecular Insights to Preclinical Models.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Heterozygous autosomal-dominant single nucleotide variants in Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess whether adeno-associated virus type-9 (AAV9)-mediated somatic genome editing could prevent ventricular arrhythmias by removal of the mutant allele in mice that are heterozygous for Methods and Results: Guide RNA and SaCas9 were delivered using AAV9 vectors injected subcutaneously in 10-day-old mice. At 6 weeks after injection, R176Q/+ mice had a 100% reduction in ventricular arrhythmias compared to controls. When aged to 12 months, injected R176Q/+ mice maintained a 100% reduction in arrhythmia induction. Deep RNA sequencing revealed the formation of insertions/deletions at the target site with minimal off-target editing on the wild-type allele. Consequently, CRISPR/SaCas9 editing resulted in a 45% reduction of total Conclusion: Taken together, AAV9-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing could efficiently disrupt the mutant
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.