Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38464667›Full record

ArticleAddiction research & theory2018

A Burning Problem: Cannabis Lessons Learned from Colorado.

Jamie E Parnes, Adrian J Bravo, Bradley T Conner, Matthew R Pearson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction research & theory, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Harm reduction strategies for cannabis-related problems: a literature review and typology.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Tetrahydrocannabivarin is Not Tetrahydrocannabinol.Cannabis and cannabinoid research · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Quantifying cannabis: A field study of marijuana quantity estimation.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jamie E ParnesDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, 1876 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA.
Adrian J BravoCenter on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, & Addictions, University of New Mexico, 2650 Yale Blvd SE, Albuquerque, NM 87106 USA.
Bradley T ConnerDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, 1876 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523 USA.
Matthew R PearsonCenter on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, & Addictions, University of New Mexico, 2650 Yale Blvd SE, Albuquerque, NM 87106 USA.

Funding

Alcohol Research Training: Methods & MechanismsT32AA018108 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI Katie A Witkiewitz · 2010 to 2026
$5.6M
Efficacy and neurobiological mechanisms of mobile-delivered cognitive retrainingK01AA023233 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI PEARSON, MATTHEW RYAN · 2014 to 2018
$832k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA023233NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA018108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With recent increases in cannabis' popularity, including being legalized in several states, new issues have emerged related to use. Increases in the number of users, new products, and home growing all present distinct concerns. In the present review, we explored various cannabis-related concerns (i.e. use, acquiring, growing, and public health/policy) that have arisen in Colorado in order to provide information on emerging issues and future directions to mitigate negative outcomes that could occur in states considering, or that already have implemented, a legalized cannabis market. Specific to Colorado, issues have arisen related to edibles, vaporizers/'e-cannabis', concentrates, growing, quantifying use, intoxicated driving, and arrests. Understanding cannabis dosing (including dose-dependent effects and related consequences), standardizing quantities, evaluating the safety of new products, and developing harm reduction interventions are important next steps for informing public policy and promoting health and well-being. Overall, increasing our knowledge of emerging issues related to cannabis is key to promoting the benefits and combating the potential harms of cannabis, especially for states legalizing medical or recreational cannabis.

Indexed as

decriminalizationlegalizationmarijuanapublic health

Identifiers

PMID38464667
PMCPMC10923185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.