ArticleMachine learning: science and technology2024
WATUNet: a deep neural network for segmentation of volumetric sweep imaging ultrasound.
Article in Machine learning: science and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- CMT-BUSNet: Adaptive Fusion-Based Triple-Branch Hybrid Architecture for Explainable Breast Ultrasound Tumor Segmentation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An AI-enabled comprehensive breast ultrasound diagnostic system for low-resource settings without a sonographer or a radiologist.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- New lung ultrasound system for rapid triage of pulmonary disease without a radiologist or sonographer.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Deep learning in renal ultrasound: applications, challenges, and future outlook.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Limited access to breast cancer diagnosis globally leads to delayed treatment. Ultrasound, an effective yet underutilized method, requires specialized training for sonographers, which hinders its widespread use. Volume sweep imaging (VSI) is an innovative approach that enables untrained operators to capture high-quality ultrasound images. Combined with deep learning, like convolutional neural networks, it can potentially transform breast cancer diagnosis, enhancing accuracy, saving time and costs, and improving patient outcomes. The widely used UNet architecture, known for medical image segmentation, has limitations, such as vanishing gradients and a lack of multi-scale feature extraction and selective region attention. In this study, we present a novel segmentation model known as Wavelet_Attention_UNet (WATUNet). In this model, we incorporate wavelet gates and attention gates between the encoder and decoder instead of a simple connection to overcome the limitations mentioned, thereby improving model performance. Two datasets are utilized for the analysis: the public 'Breast Ultrasound Images' dataset of 780 images and a private VSI dataset of 3818 images, captured at the University of Rochester by the authors. Both datasets contained segmented lesions categorized into three types: no mass, benign mass, and malignant mass. Our segmentation results show superior performance compared to other deep networks. The proposed algorithm attained a Dice coefficient of 0.94 and an F1 score of 0.94 on the VSI dataset and scored 0.93 and 0.94 on the public dataset, respectively. Moreover, our model significantly outperformed other models in McNemar's test with false discovery rate correction on a 381-image VSI set. The experimental findings demonstrate that the proposed WATUNet model achieves precise segmentation of breast lesions in both standard-of-care and VSI images, surpassing state-of-the-art models. Hence, the model holds considerable promise for assisting in lesion identification, an essential step in the clinical diagnosis of breast lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.