Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38464519›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Prognostic impact of clinical factors for immune checkpoint inhibitor with or without chemotherapy in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50.

Shota Takei, Hayato Kawachi, Tadaaki Yamada, Motohiro Tamiya, Yoshiki Negi, Yasuhiro Goto, Akira Nakao, Shinsuke Shiotsu, Keiko Tanimura, Takayuki Takeda and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Shota TakeiDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hayato KawachiDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Tadaaki YamadaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Motohiro TamiyaDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshiki NegiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Hematology, School of Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Yasuhiro GotoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan.
Akira NakaoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Nanakuma, Japan.
Shinsuke ShiotsuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Keiko TanimuraDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daini Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Takayuki TakedaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daini Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Asuka OkadaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Saiseikai Suita Hospital, Suita, Japan.
Taishi HaradaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, Fukuchiyama, Japan.
Koji DateDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Kyoto Chubu Medical Center, Nantan, Japan.
Yusuke ChiharaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Uji-Tokushukai Medical Center, Uji, Japan.
Isao HasegawaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Saiseikai Shigaken Hospital, Rittou, Japan.
Nobuyo TamiyaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuki KatayamaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Naoya NishiokaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kenji MorimotoDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Masahiro IwasakuDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Shinsaku TokudaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Takashi KijimaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Hematology, School of Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Koichi TakayamaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The proportion of older patients diagnosed with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been increasing. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy (MONO) and combination therapy of ICI and chemotherapy (COMBO) are standard treatments for patients with NSCLC and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion scores (TPS) ≥ 50%. However, evidence from the clinical trials specifically for older patients is limited. Thus, it is unclear which older patients benefit more from COMBO than MONO. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 199 older NSCLC patients of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-1 and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% who were treated with MONO or COMBO. We analyzed the association between treatment outcomes and baseline patient characteristics in each group, using propensity score matching. Results: Of the 199 patients, 131 received MONO, and 68 received COMBO. The median overall survival (OS; MONO: 25.2 vs. COMBO: 42.2 months, P = 0.116) and median progression-free survival (PFS; 10.9 vs. 11.8 months, P = 0.231) did not significantly differ between MONO and COMBO group. In the MONO group, OS was significantly shorter in patients without smoking history compared to those with smoking history [HR for smoking history against non-smoking history: 0.36 (95% CI: 0.16-0.78), P = 0.010]. In the COMBO group, OS was significantly shorter in patients with PS 1 than those with PS 0 [HR for PS 0 against PS 1: 3.84 (95% CI: 1.44-10.20), P = 0.007] and for patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SQ) compared to non-squamous cell carcinoma (non-SQ) [HR for SQ against non-SQ: 0.17 (95% CI: 0.06-0.44), P < 0.001]. For patients with ECOG PS 0 (OS: 26.1 months vs. not reached, P = 0.0031, PFS: 6.5 vs. 21.7 months, P = 0.0436) or non-SQ (OS: 23.8 months vs. not reached, P = 0.0038, PFS: 10.9 vs. 17.3 months, P = 0.0383), PFS and OS were significantly longer in the COMBO group. Conclusions: ECOG PS and histological type should be considered when choosing MONO or COMBO treatment in older patients with NSCLC and PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedB7-H1 AntigenHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedB7-H1 AntigenImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorschemoimmunotherapyimmune checkpoint inhibitorimmunochemotherapynon-small-cell lung cancerPD-L1

Identifiers

PMID38464519
PMCPMC10920331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.