Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38464451›Full record

ArticleJSES international2024

Complication rates and efficacy of single-injection vs. continuous interscalene nerve block: a prospective evaluation following arthroscopic primary rotator cuff repair without a concomitant open procedure.

James Y J Lee, John C Wu, Rishi Chatterji, Denise Koueiter, Tristan Maerz, Nicholas Dutcheshen, Brett P Wiater, Kyle Anderson, J Michael Wiater

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

James Y J LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
John C WuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Rishi ChatterjiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Ascension Providence, Michigan State University, Southfield, MI, USA.
Denise KoueiterDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Tristan MaerzDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Nicholas DutcheshenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Brett P WiaterDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Kyle AndersonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
J Michael WiaterDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To compare the complications and efficacy of pain relief of the interscalene anesthetic block using either a single-injection (SI) vs. a continuous, indwelling catheter (CIC) for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. Methods: Patients undergoing primary, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair without concomitant open procedure or biceps tenodesis were prospectively enrolled by 4 fellowship-trained sports medicine and shoulder surgeons. Patients received either a SI or CIC preoperatively based on surgeon preference. Patients were contacted by phone to complete a standard questionnaire on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28. Patients were asked to rate the efficacy of their subjective pain relief (scale of 0-10), document issues with the catheter, describe analgesic usage, and report pharmacological and medical complications. The primary outcome was measured as complication rate. Postoperative narcotic use, patient satisfaction, and visual analog scale pain scores were measured as secondary outcomes. Results: Seventy patients were enrolled, 33 CIC patients (13 male, 20 female, mean age 61 ± 8 years) and 37 SI patients (20 male, 17 female, mean age 59 ± 10 years). There were significantly more injection/insertion site complications in the CIC group (48%) vs. the SI group (11%, Conclusion: CIC interscalene nerve blocks had an increased risk for injection site complications and minor complications in the immediate postoperative period when using the CIC for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair without any concomitant open procedures. CIC blocks demonstrated clinically significant superior pain relief on POD 1 but were equal to SI blocks at every time point thereafter. Superior pain relief of CIC at POD 28 was not clinically significant. CIC catheters do not appear to markedly decrease the use of postoperative narcotics. Despite this trend in complication rates and pain scores, all patients in both groups were satisfied with their nerve block.

Indexed as

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairContinuous indwelling catheterInterscalene nerve blockPostoperative analgesiaShoulder arthroscopySingle injection block

Identifiers

PMID38464451
PMCPMC10920153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.