Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38464443›Full record

ArticleJSES international2024

Improved range of motion after manipulation under anesthesia versus physiotherapy for stage two frozen shoulder: a randomized controlled trial.

Tim Kraal, Yordi de Wit, Bertram The, Leonieke van Boekel, Iris Koenraadt-van Oost, Ronald Boer, Maaike Vd Borne, Pjotr Goossens, Koen Koenraadt, Denise Eygendaal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tim KraalDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Flevo Hospital, Almere, the Netherlands.
Yordi de WitDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Bertram TheDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Leonieke van BoekelDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Iris Koenraadt-van OostDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Ronald BoerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Maaike Vd BorneDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Pjotr GoossensDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Koen KoenraadtFoundation for Orthopedic Research, Care & Education, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Denise EygendaalDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Frozen shoulder (FS) is a common cause of shoulder pain and stiffness. Conservative treatment is sufficient for the majority of patients with long-term recovery of shoulder function. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is known as a well-established treatment option if conservative treatment fails. It is unknown whether MUA does indeed shorten the duration of symptoms or leads to a superior outcome compared to conservative treatment. The objective of the current trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of MUA followed by a physiotherapy (PT) program compared to a PT program alone in patients with stage 2 FS. Methods: A prospective, single-center randomized controlled trial was performed. Patients between 18 and 70 years old with stage 2 FS were deemed eligible if an initial course of conservative treatment consisting of PT and intra-articular corticosteroid infiltration was considered unsatisfactory. Patients were randomized, and data was collected with an online data management platform (CASTOR). MUA was performed by a single surgeon under interscalene block, and intensive PT treatment protocol was started within 4 hours after MUA. In the PT group, patients were referred to instructed physiotherapist, and treatment was guided by tissue irritability. The primary outcome was the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) score. Secondary outcomes were pain, range of motion (ROM), Oxford Shoulder Score, quality of life, and ability to work. Results: In total, 82 patients were included, 42 in the PT group and 40 in the MUA group. There was a significant improvement in SPADI, Oxford Shoulder Score, pain, ROM, and quality of life in both groups at 1-year follow-up. SPADI scores at three months were significantly improved in favor of MUA. MUA showed a significantly bigger increase in anteflexion and abduction compared to PT at all points of follow-up. No significant differences between both groups were found for all other parameters. No fractures, dislocations, or brachial plexus injuries occurred in this trial. Conclusion: MUA in stage 2 FS can be considered safe and results in a faster recovery of ROM and improved functional outcome, measured with SPADI scores, compared to PT alone in the short term. After 1 year, except for slightly better ROM scores for MUA, the result of MUA is equal to PT.

Indexed as

Frozen shoulderManipulation under anesthesiaPhysiotherapyRandomized controlled trialRange of motionSPADI

Identifiers

PMID38464443
PMCPMC10920131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.