Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38464434›Full record

ArticleJSES international2024

Analysis of patient-directed search content and online resource quality for ulnar collateral ligament injury and surgery.

Johnathon R McCormick, William E Harkin, Alexander J Hodakowski, John T Streepy, Zeeshan A Khan, Colton C Mowers, Braedon R Urie, Harkirat S Jawanda, Garrett R Jackson, Jorge Chahla and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JSES international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Johnathon R McCormickRush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chicago, IL, USA.
William E HarkinRush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chicago, IL, USA.
Alexander J HodakowskiRush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chicago, IL, USA.
John T StreepyRush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chicago, IL, USA.
Zeeshan A KhanRush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chicago, IL, USA.
Colton C MowersRush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chicago, IL, USA.
Braedon R UrieRush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chicago, IL, USA.
Harkirat S JawandaRush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chicago, IL, USA.
Garrett R JacksonRush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jorge ChahlaRush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chicago, IL, USA.
Grant E GarriguesRush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chicago, IL, USA.
Nikhil N VermaRush University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients use the Internet to learn information about injuries, yet online content remains largely unstudied. This study analyzed patient questions posed online regarding ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) tears or UCL surgical management. Methods: Three separate search strings about UCL tear and UCL surgery were queried on the Google search engine. The 300 most commonly asked questions were compiled for each topic and associated webpage information was collected from the "People also ask" section. Questions were categorized using the Rothwell classification and webpages by Results: The most frequent UCL tear questions were "how long does it take to heal a torn UCL?" and "what is nonsurgical treatment for the UCL?" The most frequent UCL surgery question was "can you retear your UCL after surgery?" The Rothwell classification of questions for UCL tear/UCL surgery was 55%/32% policy, 38%/57% fact, and 7%/11% value with highest subcategories being indications/management (46%/25%) and technical details (24%/25%). The most common webpages were academic (39%/29%) and medical practice (24%/26%). Mean JAMA score for all 600 webpages was low (1.2), with journals (mean = 3.4) having the highest score. Medical practice (mean = 0.5) and legal websites (mean = 0.0) had the lowest JAMA scores. Only 30% of webpages provided UCL-specific information. Conclusion: Online UCL patient questions commonly pertain to technical details and injury management. Webpages suggested by search engines contain information specific to UCL tears and surgery only one-third of the time. The quality of most webpages provided to patients is poor, with minimal source transparency.

Indexed as

GoogleOnline questionsPatient educationPeople also askUlnar collateral ligament surgeryUlnar collateral ligament tear

Identifiers

PMID38464434
PMCPMC10920115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.