Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38464419›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2024

Use of preventive service and potentially preventable hospitalization among American adults with disability: Longitudinal analysis of Traditional Medicare and commercial insurance.

Elham Mahmoudi, Paul Lin, Dana Rubenstein, Timothy Guetterman, Amanda Leggett, Katherine L Possin, Neil Kamdar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elham MahmoudiDepartment of Family Medicine, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, USA.
Paul LinInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Dana RubensteinClinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, 701 West Main Street, Durham, NC, USA.
Timothy GuettermanDepartment of Family Medicine, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, USA.
Amanda LeggettInstitute of Gerontology & Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA.
Katherine L PossinMemory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Neil KamdarInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG072931 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Henry L Paulson · 2021 to 2026
$26.5M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Examine the association between traditional Medicare (TM) vs. commercial insurance and the use of preventive care and potentially preventable hospitalization (PPH) among adults (18+) with disability [cerebral palsy/spina bifida (CP/SB); multiple sclerosis (MS); traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI)] in the United States. Methods: Using 2008-2016 Medicare and commercial claims data, we compared adults with the same disability enrolled in TM vs. commercial insurance [Medicare: n = 21,599 (CP/SB); n = 7,605 (MS); n = 4,802 (TSCI); commercial: n = 11,306 (CP/SB); n = 6,254 (MS); n = 5,265 (TSCI)]. We applied generalized estimating equations to address repeated measures, comparing cases with controls. All models were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and comorbid conditions. Results: Compared with commercial insurance, enrolling in TM reduced the odds of using preventive services. For example, adjusted odds ratios (OR) of annual wellness visits in TM vs. commercial insurance were 0.31 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28-0.34), 0.32 (95% CI: 0.28-0.37), and 0.19 (95% CI: 0.17-0.22) among adults with CP/SB, TSCI, and MS, respectively. Furthermore, PPH risks were higher in TM vs. commercial insurance. ORs of PPH in TM vs. commercial insurance were 1.50 (95% CI: 1.18-1.89), 1.83 (95% CI: 1.40-2.41), and 2.32 (95% CI: 1.66-3.22) among adults with CP/SB, TSCI, and MS, respectively. Moreover, dual-eligible adults had higher odds of PPH compared with non-dual-eligible adults [CP/SB: OR = 1.47 (95% CI: 1.25-1.72); TSCI: OR = 1.61 (95% CI: 1.35-1.92), and MS: OR = 1.80 (95% CI: 1.55-2.10)]. Conclusions: TM, relative to commercial insurance, was associated with lower receipt of preventive care and higher PPH risk among adults with disability.

Indexed as

DisabilityInsuranceMedicaidMedicareMedicare AdvantageOptumInsightPotentially Preventable HospitalizationPreventive Services

Identifiers

PMID38464419
PMCPMC10920729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.