ArticlePreventive medicine reports2024
A retrospective review of the rate of sexually transmitted infections in adolescents after universal screening protocol implementation in an urban United States clinic.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Despite expanded guidelines, adolescent gonorrhea and chlamydia (GC/CT) screening rates remain low due to multiple psychosocial barriers and biases. This intervention aimed to improve screening and diagnosis rates at adolescent well visits by establishing a streamlined universal screening protocol for all patients ages 13-18 years old. Methods: A universal sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening approach was introduced at an urban clinic affiliated with an academic medical center near Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (PA) in September 2018 for all adolescent well-visits. GC/CT screening and diagnosis rates were compared two years prior to and two years after implementation, deemed the baseline and intervention groups, respectively. Results: In total, 1,168 encounters were included for analysis. The patient cohort consisted of 47% females, with an average age of 15, and were predominantly publicly insured (79%). STI screening rates increased significantly from 16.7% (89/534) to 83.6% (530/634) of adolescents with implementation of the universal screening protocol. Furthermore, there was a 1.6-fold increase in total positive cases detected after implementation of ok universal screening. Conclusion: This study demonstrates improved adolescent GC/CT capture rates by establishing a universal screening protocol and highlights a streamlined means of implementation in virtually any pediatric clinic. Limitations include sample size, as this is a single academic practice, as well as any issues with lab collection and results reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.