Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38464403›Full record

ArticleRevista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)

[Use of skeletal-related diagnostic methods in articles published from 2018 to 2020 in four major orthodontics journals].

Enrique Manuel De Los Ríos Fernández

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Enrique Manuel De Los Ríos FernándezFacultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Tucumán, Argentina. enrique78@hotmail.com Universidad Nacional de Tucumán Facultad de Odontología Universidad Nacional de Tucumán Tucumán Argentina enrique78@hotmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3710-6373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To determine the skeletal-related diagnostic methods most commonly used according to the four most important orthodontics journals in the period from 2018 to 2020. Methods: A review of the data available regarding the diagnostic procedures most frequently used to determine skeletal relationships in the four most important orthodontics journals from 2018 to 2020. Article review was performed using SCIMAGO 2018, which provides a series of parameters ranking the importance of the impact of publications and journals. We made a synopsis of the information analyzed to establish a correlation and compare sources, and critically examined the articles collected on the subject of interest. An online bibliographic search of databases including mainly Medline was carried out, followed by evaluation and selection of the bibliography, organized according to the significance and nature of the study. Results: The four journals included in the bibliographic search were: AJODO, AO, EJO and KJO. The A point-Nasion-B point (ANB) method was used in 92.2% of the articles published in AJODO, and 7.8% did not describe the method used. Twenty-three articles in the AO journal were evaluated, all of which referred to the use of ANB as the method used. Finally, 16 and 11 articles from the EJO and KJO journals, respectively, were evaluated, with 93.8% and 95%, respectively of the articles using ANB as the method of choice for determining skeletal relationships. Conclusion: The method of choice for skeletal-related diagnostics is ANB, although this widely known method presents a risk of geometric effect.

Indexed as

DiagnosisSkeletal relationship

Identifiers

PMID38464403
PMCPMC10919820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.