ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Auditory Feature-based Perceptual Distance.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies comparing acoustic signals often rely on pixel-wise differences between spectrograms, as in for example mean squared error (MSE). Pixel-wise errors are not representative of perceptual sensitivity, however, and such measures can be highly sensitive to small local signal changes that may be imperceptible. In computer vision, high-level visual features extracted with convolutional neural networks (CNN) can be used to calculate the fidelity of computer-generated images. Here, we propose the auditory perceptual distance (APD) metric based on acoustic features extracted with an unsupervised CNN and validated by perceptual behavior. Using complex vocal signals from songbirds, we trained a Siamese CNN on a self-supervised task using spectrograms rescaled to match the auditory frequency sensitivity of European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris. We define APD for any pair of sounds as the cosine distance between corresponding feature vectors extracted by the trained CNN. We show that APD is more robust to temporal and spectral translation than MSE, and captures the sigmoidal shape of typical behavioral psychometric functions over complex acoustic spaces. When fine-tuned using starlings' behavioral judgments of naturalistic song syllables, the APD model yields even more accurate predictions of perceptual sensitivity, discrimination, and categorization on novel complex (high-dimensional) acoustic dimensions, including diverging decisions for identical stimuli following different training conditions. Thus, the APD model outperforms MSE in robustness and perceptual accuracy, and offers tunability to match experience-dependent perceptual biases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.