ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Oarfish: Enhanced probabilistic modeling leads to improved accuracy in long read transcriptome quantification.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Long read sequencing technology is becoming an increasingly indispensable tool in genomic and transcriptomic analysis. In transcriptomics in particular, long reads offer the possibility of sequencing full-length isoforms, which can vastly simplify the identification of novel transcripts and transcript quantification. However, despite this promise, the focus of much long read method development to date has been on transcript identification, with comparatively little attention paid to quantification. Yet, due to differences in the underlying protocols and technologies, lower throughput (i.e. fewer reads sequenced per sample compared to short read technologies), as well as technical artifacts, long read quantification remains a challenge, motivating the continued development and assessment of quantification methods tailored to this increasingly prevalent type of data. Results: We introduce a new method and software tool for long read transcript quantification called oarfish. Our model incorporates a novel and innovative coverage score, which affects the conditional probability of fragment assignment in the underlying probabilistic model. We demonstrate that by accounting for this coverage information, oarfish is able to produce more accurate quantification estimates than existing long read quantification methods, particularly when one considers the primary isoforms present in a particular cell line or tissue type. Availability and Implementation: Oarfish is implemented in the Rust programming language, and is made available as free and open-source software under the BSD 3-clause license. The source code is available at https://www.github.com/COMBINE-lab/oarfish.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.