ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Individualized temporal patterns dominate cortical upstate and sleep depth in driving human sleep spindle timing.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sleep spindles are critical for memory consolidation and strongly linked to neurological disease and aging. Despite their significance, the relative influences of factors like sleep depth, cortical up/down states, and spindle temporal patterns on individual spindle production remain poorly understood. Moreover, spindle temporal patterns are typically ignored in favor of an average spindle rate. Here, we analyze spindle dynamics in 1008 participants from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis using a point process framework. Results reveal fingerprint-like temporal patterns, characterized by a refractory period followed by a period of increased spindle activity, which are highly individualized yet consistent night-to-night. We observe increased timing variability with age and distinct gender/age differences. Strikingly, and in contrast to the prevailing notion, individualized spindle patterns are the dominant determinant of spindle timing, accounting for over 70% of the statistical deviance explained by all of the factors we assessed, surpassing the contribution of slow oscillation (SO) phase (~14%) and sleep depth (~16%). Furthermore, we show spindle/SO coupling dynamics with sleep depth are preserved across age, with a global negative shift towards the SO rising slope. These findings offer novel mechanistic insights into spindle dynamics with direct experimental implications and applications to individualized electroencephalography biomarker identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.