ArticleCaspian journal of internal medicine2024
Nephrocalcinosis fortuitously discovered: the role of surreptitious self administration of diuretics.
Article in Caspian journal of internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Furosemide is a drug widely used for several medical conditions and could be used without medical prescription. Furosemide-related nephrocalcinosis can occur regardless of age, although the risk is higher in premature infants. The defining characteristic of nephrocalcinosis is generalized calcium deposition in the kidney. The most useful imaging studies for evaluation are ultrasonography and computed tomography (more effective in detecting calcification). Case Presentation: A 32-year-old woman with a history of depressive syndrome was admitted for evaluation of fortuitously discovered nephrocalcinosis and hypokalemia. The studies performed revealed the presence of a metabolic alkalosis with discrete hyperreninism/hyperaldosteronism but normal ratio, normotension and urinary study showed elevated sodium, chloride, potassium and calcium fluctuating in different determinations. Surreptitious diuretic intake was suspected and urine analysis revealed doses equivalent to 80-120 mg. The patient was advised to discontinue all diuretic treatment; she was adequately supplemented with potassium and she was followed-up in outpatient clinics. During the follow-up, clinical and analytical improvement was noted, which led to the discontinuation of supplementation. Conclusion: Surreptitious diuretic intake is a clinical condition to rule out in patients with chronic hypokalemia, metabolic alkalosis with elevated urinary sodium and chloride. The relation between surreptitious diuretic intake and nephrocalcinosis has not been fully elucidated in adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.