ArticleHeliyon2024
Paretic propulsion changes with handrail Use in individuals post-stroke.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Roughly 800,000 people experience a stroke every year in the United States, and about 30% of people require walking assistance (walker, cane, etc.) after a stroke. Gait training on a treadmill is a common rehabilitation activity for individuals post-stroke and handrails are typically used to assist with walking during this training, however individual interaction with these handrails are not usually considered and quantitatively reported. Individuals may exert force onto the handrails to aid with propulsive force, but the relationship between limb propulsive force and handrail propulsive force are not known. Research question: How do individuals post-stroke alter paretic propulsive force when using an assistive device, such as handrails on a treadmill? Methods: Twenty-one individuals post-stroke (eight current assistive device users and thirteen individuals who do not use an assistive device) walked on a treadmill for 3 min during three conditions: no handrail use, light handrail use (<5% BW) and self-selected handrail use. Three multilevel models were used to compare percent handrail, paretic and nonparetic propulsion between handrail conditions and assistive device groups. Results: The handrail propulsive impulse was more during the self-selected handrail condition compared to the light handrail condition (p = 0.002). The assistive device use group and the handrail condition fixed effects significantly improved the model fit for paretic propulsive impulse (p = 0.01). The interaction between assistive device use group and handrail condition significantly improved the model fit for nonparetic propulsive impulse (p < 0.001). Significance: These results suggest that handrail use may impact paretic propulsive impulse. Our initial results suggest that if the goal of rehabilitation treadmill training is to increase the paretic propulsive impulse, having the clinician encourage walking with the handrails may be optimal to promote paretic propulsion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.