ArticleHeliyon2024
Reducing variability in nasal surgery outcomes through computational fluid dynamics and advanced 3D virtual surgery techniques.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomechanical analysis of upper airway airflow characteristics in children.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026Article
- From Conventional Septoplasty to Patient-Specific Cartilage Reshaping: A Systematic Review of Laser-Mediated and Electromechanical Approaches.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Computational Fluid Dynamics and Virtual Septoplasty in Nasal Airway Obstruction: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Sphenoid sinus hyperpneumatization: anatomical variants, molecular blueprints, and AI-augmented roadmaps for skull base surgery.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- [Study on simulated airflow dynamics of children with obstructive sleep apnea treated by different surgical methods].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to delineate the specific impact of using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and 3D virtual surgery techniques in otolaryngology surgery, focusing on their roles in enhancing the precision of nasal surgery and optimizing future patient outcomes. The central objective was to assess whether these advanced technologies could reduce variability in surgical approaches and decision-making among specialists, thereby improving the consistency and efficacy of patient care in cases of nasal obstruction. Methods and results: Our methodology involved a detailed analysis of pre- and post-operative scenarios using CFD feedback. Six otolaryngologists participated, employing virtual surgery techniques on two patients with diagnosed nasal obstruction. The CFD analysis focused on quantifying key airflow parameters: right nasal flow rate (QR), left nasal flow rate (QL), flow symmetry (Ф), and bilateral nasal resistance (R). These parameters were meticulously compared before and after the application of CFD feedback to evaluate changes in surgical planning and outcomes. Quantitative analysis revealed a notable decrease in the standard deviation of the measured parameters among the specialists post-CFD feedback, indicating reduced variability in surgical approaches. Specifically, for Patient #1 the standard deviation for QR values dropped from 0.694 L/min to 0.602 L/min, and for QL values from 0.676 L/min to 0.584 L/min, and for Patient #2, the standard deviation for QR values decreased from 2.204 L/min to 0.958 L/min, and for QL values from 2.295 L/min to 1.014 L/min. Moreover, the variability range, represented by the differences between the maximum and minimum values for Ф and R, diminished significantly. Post-operative average values for all parameters showed a convergence towards ideal basal levels, suggesting a more uniform and effective surgical strategy across different surgeons. Conclusions: Both integration of CFD and 3D virtual surgery techniques in otolaryngology can substantially reduce variability in surgical planning and decision-making, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes. These advanced tools have the potential to standardize the diagnosis and treatment of nasal pathologies, contributing to more effective and consistent care. Future research in this area should focus on larger patient cohorts and further exploration of the potential benefits and applications of CFD and virtual surgery in otolaryngology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.