Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38463838›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Dual immunotherapy in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A network meta-analysis.

Yuanyuan Yang, Dao Xin, Lulu Guan, Xi Luo, Han Wu, Jingwen Chu, Jianxiang Xing, Chengjiang Liu, Feng Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yuanyuan YangDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
Dao XinDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
Lulu GuanDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
Xi LuoDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
Han WuDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
Jingwen ChuDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
Jianxiang XingDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
Chengjiang LiuDepartment of General Medicine, Affiliated Anqing First People's Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Anqing 246000, China.
Feng WangDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Recently, there has been extensive research on dual immunotherapy for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet a comprehensive evaluation is lacking. This study aimed to rank the available treatment options and assess the efficacy and safety of dual immunotherapy regimens through the implementation of a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). Materials and methods: A thorough search was conducted to recognize eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on March 20, 2023. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and grade ≥3 TRAEs were evaluated to identify the efficacy and safety of dual immunotherapy regimens. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) and Results: Eleven clinical trials involving six different regimens were included in this study. The combination of anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) antibodies with anti-T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) antibodies emerged as the most promising regimen for improving OS and PFS, followed by anti-PD-1/PD-L1 + anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) + chemotherapy treatment and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 + anti-CTLA-4 treatment. The forest plots demonstrated that these three regimens were all superior to chemotherapy. The above results were observed in both unselected treatment line and first-line settings. The least likely to be associated with TRAEs and grade ≥3 TRAEs were respectively anti-CTLA-4 treatment and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 + anti-TIGIT treatment, with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 + anti-CTLA-4 + chemotherapy treatment to be the worst. Conclusions: This NMA validated the promising efficacy and safety of dual immunotherapy in advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Among them, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 + anti-TIGIT regimen emerges as a highly potential therapeutic approach. Ongoing research efforts should focus on improving treatment regimens, identifying biomarkers, and managing TRAEs to optimize the patient benefits of dual immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodyAnti-TIGIT antibodyDual immunotherapyImmune checkpoint inhibitorNetwork meta-analysisNon-small cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID38463838
PMCPMC10923855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.