ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Maintaining Functionality in Temporal Skin Tumor Surgery: A Focus on Nerve Injury and Excision Margins.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microsurgical Reconstruction of the Ear and Temporal Region: Structural and Functional Considerations Including Hearing Rehabilitation-A Narrative Review.Audiology research · 2026Review
- An Atypical Anatomical Variation in Facial Nerve Position: Temporal Branch Lateral and Main Trunk Medial to the Retromandibular Vein in a Series of Three Cadaveric Cases With Clinical Implications.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Operating on temporal cutaneous tumors is challenging because of the intricate facial nerve system, particularly the frontal branches, and the possibility of brow dysfunction. Surgery for deep margin clearance is difficult because of the fragile and sensitive soft tissue in the temporal region. To address this research gap, this study assessed clearance margins, types of skin tumors, and nerve injuries in this critical anatomical position. This retrospective study assessed temporal skin cancer surgery, malignancy types, and clearance margins in patients with frontal-branch facial nerve injuries. Methods: Forty-five patients with temporal skin carcinoma biopsies were analyzed. The deep and peripheral excision margins of skin malignancies were examined. Medical records were reviewed for clinically injured frontal nerve. Results: Thirty-four patients were men (75%), and basal cell carcinoma was the most prevalent histological malignancy, followed by squamous cell carcinoma. The mean age of the patients was 77.8 years (39-107 years). Two patients experienced damage to the frontal branch nerve. Twenty-six percent of the skin malignancies had inadequate deep margin excision. Conclusions: Removing temporal skin lesions is difficult. We discovered a 26% and 4% probability of inadequate deep margin excision and frontal branch facial nerve injury, respectively. Temporal skin lesions must be removed safely by surgeons to preserve the branches of the facial nerves. Insufficiently removed tumors require multidisciplinary teamwork and patient discussions regarding the advantages and risks to improve results.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.